• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Read An Issue
  • About
  • Advertising Information
  • Where to Find the Reader
  • Subscribe to our Mailing List
  • Contact Us

Park Slope Reader

  • The Reader Interview
  • Eat Local
  • Dispatches From Babyville
  • Park Slope Life
  • Reader Profile
  • Slope Survey

Park Slope

Picture This: Our Conversation with Rooftop Films Creative Director Dan Nuxoll

August 2, 2017 By Lindsay Owen Filed Under: Park Slope Life Tagged With: documentary, film, independent films, lindsay owens, Park Slope, Rooftop Films

You’re sitting on a rooftop in downtown Manhattan with around 200 other people. It’s an early evening in June and a warm summer breeze is blowing as the sun starts to set. The sky around you transforms from blue to every color of pink you can imagine framing your 360 degree view of the city in unspeakable beauty. The excitement is palpable as the audience waits for the evening’s entertainment to commence– in this case, a very fine (and very funny) documentary about the musician José Gonzáles.

As the sun makes its final farewell and day turns into night, Jose himself makes an appearance and treats you and your movie going companions to a live acoustic performance of his ethereal, hypnotic songs. You feel like you’re one of the lucky ones. That you’re in the know. That while it’s business as usual on the streets far below you, while people pass the building you sit atop, oblivious to this secretive spectacle above them , you’re one of the privileged few.

That was my first experience of a Rooftop Films screening, which I attended back in 2012. This gem of a film festival, now in its 20th year, has grown bigger and better with every summer season.

Dan Nixon, Creative Director of Rooftop Films

At the center of Rooftop Film’s vision is its artistic director, Dan Nuxoll. A film director, producer, composer, and Brooklyn local, Dan is responsible for curating each year’s cinematic program from the over 3,000 submissions the festival now receives annually. Currently co-directing a new documentary feature film, Dan was recently included in Brooklyn Magazine’s list of The 100 Most Influential People in Brooklyn Culture.

So, for everything you never knew you wanted to know about Rooftop Films, here’s Dan Nuxoll himself, who took some time out to answer my questions about Rooftop Film’s origins, where it’s headed next, and what you can expect from this year’s festival.

 

Hey Dan. Now, for those unfamiliar with RTF, can you encapsulate the festival and its vibe in a few sentences?

Sure! Rooftop is a not-for-profit film organization founded in 1997. We do a lot of different things in the independent film world, including giving out grants and renting and donating equipment to other organizations to help them put on their own screenings, but the thing we are best known for is the Rooftop Films Summer Series. The Summer Series is in many ways a summer-long film festival: We screen more than 35 new, independent, and foreign feature films from all over the world, as well as more than 100 new short films. All of our summer events take place in scenic outdoor locations (often, though not always, on rooftops), and we always include special enhancements to our events, including live music performances before all of our screenings, Q and A’s with filmmakers after the screenings, and after parties following most of our ticketed events.

The origins of RTF, much like those of the Moth, are the stuff of legend; the festival almost seems to have begun by happy accident. Can you describe how RTF came to be?

Yeah, it is true that we definitely did not originally intend to build an entire film organization that would still be around 20 years later. The very first screening was pretty much organized as a one-man-operation by Mark Elijah Rosenberg. He and I went to Vassar together and it was his idea to show movies on rooftops. Back then he mostly just wanted to show some new short films by himself and some filmmakers he admired, but being just 21 years old and fresh out of college, there wasn’t any money to rent a theater. He did, however, have access to a small rooftop above his apartment building in the East Village, so he lugged a 16mm projector up to the roof and hooked it up to his brother’s punk band’s PA system and invited anyone he could to come drink some beers and watch some movies.

The evening turned out great and the next year he wanted to do it again, but his landlord definitely wasn’t going to let him use that roof again. But along with some friends from high school, I had renovated a gigantic 10,000 square foot warehouse space in the as-yet ungentrified neighborhood of Bushwick in what would eventually come to be known as the McKibbin St. Lofts. We had a huge indoor space and an even bigger rooftop, so we built a screen on the roof and started doing shows there. That’s where we were based for the next five years until I moved out of that building.

We kept expanding our activities, going from one to four to eight to sixteen screenings a year, and at that point it had become too much work to remain a hobby. We incorporated as a non-profit, moved our offices into the Old American Can Factory in Gowanus, and continued to expand. So, it wasn’t by any means an overnight success, but we certainly have become a much more substantial organization than we had originally intended to be.

At what point over the last 20 years of the program did you realize that the festival had become something important for NY moviegoers?

Hmm. I am not sure that there was any single moment in time. But there were certainly some moments along the way. Eventually our shows started to become very, very large, and that certainly made an impression on us. I remember in 2008 we presented the premiere of this fantastic documentary about the LES photographer Clayton Patterson and more than 1,100 people showed up, including Ed Koch (despite the fact that he was not favorably portrayed in the film). That certainly made an impression.

And there were many other highlights: screening Trouble the Water in Harlem Meer, giving a grant to help get Beasts of the Southern Wild made, and just generally seeing so many of the young NYC filmmakers that we had championed succeed, people like Lena Dunham, Benh Zeitlin, and Casey Neistat. With each new talent taking the step to the next level we are reminded that organizations like our own play an important role in the creative life of the city.

What do you think attracts movie fans to the festival?

Well, it’s a number of things. I think, perhaps most importantly, we prioritize the films and the audience experience and don’t get distracted by the other elements that some other festivals are distracted by. We are always focused on creating events that are fun, interesting, engaging, interactive, and unique, and we try to create as many incentives as possible for audience members to come out to our shows. Of course we work very, very hard on our film programming—we watch more than 3,500 films every year and we only show 3% of them, so the films we are presenting are definitely very thoroughly vetted. But, in addition to that, we have a fantastic music programmer who finds great emerging artists to perform before the films. We have free drinks after most of our screenings. And the venues are beautiful, interesting places that would be fun places to hang out at even if nothing was going on. I think our film curation is excellent, but often people show up not knowing much about what they are going to see that night, and that’s great. We want to draw people in to discover something new and unexpected.

Can you describe the process of selecting movies for the program? What’s your main priority when putting together the schedule for each season?

Rooftop has a pretty big team of people who watch the films. We receive thousands of blind submissions each year and also attend festivals like Sundance, IDFA, SXSW, and Toronto to track down others. We also request a lot of films from filmmakers and producers that we have heard good things about. We have a screening committee of about thirty paid people and have three full-time employees who also work on programming (including myself). We sift through all those movies and choose the films we think will work best for us.

The first most important criteria are that the films are new, independent, or foreign, and that we think they are great. We are particularly interested in films that are innovative and come from a fresh perspective. Luckily, we have a young and adventurous audience that is excited when we take chances, so we don’t have many creative restrictions on our programming. Our audience is willing to come out for even experimental films by unknown filmmakers because they trust us—which makes our jobs a lot easier.

But the one thing that differentiates us quite a bit from other festivals is that we are more event-based, so we do take things into account that other festivals might not. For instance, if there is a film that could involve an exciting performance component, then we are more likely to show that film than a film that doesn’t. For this reason we show more music-based films than your average festival, and those events are usually pretty special—we’ve shown documentaries accompanied by performances by rapper Danny Brown, singer-songwriter Jose Gonzalez, and many, many others. We also take into account venue; if there is a movie that works particularly well at one of our venues, then we are more likely to lock that film in. And sometimes we take our show on the road to create something special, like when we showed Beasts of the Southern Wild in the bayou in Louisiana.

Brookfield Place – Credit Darial Sneed

You’ve expanded the number of screening locations over the years. What’s precipitated that and how do you chose new venues?

We do about 45-60 big screenings a year at this point, starting in May and wrapping up in September—usually about 3 or 4 screenings a week. We expanded to that number mostly because that was the number that seemed to work. Setting up a large outdoor screening takes a LOT of work and preparation, so we don’t want to put together a full screening unless we really think that the event will be special. The last several years we have felt that if we did fewer screenings than that we would be rejecting a lot of films that we very much love, but, if we did many more screenings than that, we felt that the quality of the films and the quality of our presentation suffered a bit. So 45-50 shows seems like the right number.

RTF now offers grants to moviemakers to fund the making of independent movies. When did offering grants become an important goal for the RTF?

In our early years we wanted to do whatever we could to support the filmmakers who had been kind enough to screen with us, but back then we really had no money whatsoever. So we decided to raise our ticket price by 1 dollar (from $5 to $6!) and we were going to put all those extra $1 bills into a fund to give out grants to short filmmakers whose work we had shown to help them a little bit down the line. Over time that fund expanded as we grew as an organization and we also started to bring in sponsors who were excited to support the filmmakers as well. We get cash sponsorships for our fund from various supporters like GarboNYC, and we also are able to award some really generous service grants like lighting equipment form Eastern Effects (who are right in the neighborhood), camera packages from Technological Cinevideo Services, visual effects from Edgeworx, and publicity grants from Brigade Marketing.

Our rationale for giving out grants was that we could get more support and do more good by putting resources towards 10 or 15 grants than if we split it up between everyone, and we think that has worked out pretty well.

Which RTF funded movies are you most proud of?

There are a lot! This year our grantees had a great deal of success, so we are feeling pretty lucky. Kitty Green’s film Casting JonBenet premiered at Sundance and just recently made a sensation when it premiered on Netflix. Joshua Z Weinstein’s Menashe turned out even better than we had hoped and A24 will be distributing it in theaters this summer. Ana Lily Amirpour’s film The Bad Batch blew up at Toronto and will be released by Neon this summer as well. Rachel Israel’s Keep the Change just won best fiction film and best new director at Tribeca. So those all came out pretty well. But there have been many other fantastic films over the years, including some I mentioned earlier as well as Martha Marcy May Marlene, Obvious Child, Ain’t Them Bodies Saints, and too many others to list here.

Can you describe the average RTF movie goer?

Well, we move around to about 15 different venues all across the city, so the average attendee varies a bit from one location to the next. But generally speaking our attendees tend to be on the young side, relative to other film organizations. The majority are in the 15-40 age range, and most are pretty culturally savvy—not necessarily cinephiles, per se, but certainly people who are interested and invested in film, culture, music and the arts in general. They are also an adventurous bunch, and many people come out to shows just to see different corners of the city.

What are you most excited about for this year’s festival?

I am really quite thrilled with our program this year. Frankly, we have been able to get just about all the movies that I most loved this year. But some of my favorites coming up are Dave McCary’s hilarious comedy Brigsby Bear, Ana Lily Amirpour’s aforementioned The Bad Batch, Jeff Unay’s beautiful documentary The Cage Figher, Josh Weinstein’s Menashe, Amman Abassi’s heartbreaking Dayveon, and a bunch of great documentaries, especially Liberation Day, The Challenge, the Sundance-winning Dina, and my very favorite doc of the year, The Work. But come on out to everything. I promise you there are no duds this year.

Where next for RTF? How do you hope the festival will continue to grow and evolve?

Well, the three things we would most like to do are:

1. Establish a permanent or semi-permanent home at one venue with a Rooftop. We will always move around to different locations, but none of our current locations are really completely our own, so it would be great to get a long-term commitment from a place with a great roof.

2 Expand our programming in less well-off NYC communities. We already do screenings in communities that are less culturally well-served, but we would love to get the funding to do more screenings in such neighborhoods. I would love it if we could help local young people to build their own local screening series.

3 Expand our screenings in other cities. We have done dozens of screenings outside New York, but we have never set up a full series in another town. I think that there are a lot of cities that would really benefit from what we do, so hopefully we are able to get a few more series up and running soon.

Are there any established directors you’d like to include in the festival?

Well, not really. Our focus has always been and always will be on discovering new talent, so the filmmakers I want to bring to the Summer Series probably haven’t completed their first feature film yet. It’s fun when we are able to present work by more established directors that I admire, but it will always be much more exciting to us to present work by filmmakers that no one has heard of yet. It’s our job to make sure that people hear about them in the future. I hope that never changes.

 

Filed Under: Park Slope Life Tagged With: documentary, film, independent films, lindsay owens, Park Slope, Rooftop Films

In Praise of the Summer Camp

May 10, 2017 By Caitlin Leonard Filed Under: A Camping We Will Go Tagged With: Brooklyn, kids, Park Slope, Summer camp

Attending summer camp is a memorable rite of passage. Whether it’s in the form of a weeklong sleep away adventure, or a daytime activity program, the camp experience comes with memories that can last a lifetime.

Camps today are metamorphosing to keep up with modern innovations. Although some stick to the tried and true values of physical activity, learning, and friendship building, there are now more specific concentrations to be found at all levels and on all kinds of different subjects. Whatever a child’s best interest, there is likely a summer camp centered around it. Evolutions in the summer camp have come to include everything from rock and roll to rock climbing, science experiments and media production.

 

Brooklyn Sewcial

 

New York City is the locale with some of the most extensive options, and kids will really have their pick when it comes to the classic or innovative camps when summer begins. Some standouts taking place this summer include Brooklyn Sewcial, which offers week-long creative programs focusing on interesting projects like fashion design, pottery, and art, and The Co-op School, which also fosters curiosity and learning through music, movement, fine arts, literature and science. Other camps are more academic minded but still take place in an enjoyable atmosphere, like Mathnasium, which has a unique program helping kids to keep their math skills strong throughout the summer. It includes no homework, quizzes or tests, and the focus is simply learning math while having fun.

Kim’s Kids Club is a Park Slope area summer program for kids, where they can just be kids. Daily activities include beach trips, rock climbing, and hiking. This program also offers flexible scheduling, meaning kids can attend for as little as three days per week, or as much as a six week camp.

 

Kim’s Kid Club

 

Another advantage of living in a large city center is that often professionals are brought in for extra enrichment, and field trips can include visits to world-class art galleries and museums. For budding thespians and musicians, there are several options. For acting, there is Brooklyn Acting Lab which offers weekly immersive theatre programs, which incorporate play, games, art and music into each day. There is also Piper Theatre Productions, another notable opportunity where kids create full-scale outdoor theatre productions in Old Stone House and Washington Square. For this program, there are options for week-long acting camps, as well as four-week theatre and musical theatre workshops. Gowanus Music Club also offers lessons in rock music, where kids can experience recording sessions, playing in live performances, and find the joy of being in a band.

 

 Gowanus Music Club

 

For cultural adventures, there is the aptly named Brooklyn Cultural Adventures Program whose 2017 theme is ”More than Meets the Eye: Uncover the incredible world around you.” This camp includes visits to cultural institutions, games, challenges, and tours focusing on everything from art and literature, to nature and science. Children are welcome from across the city, country, and world for these programs. Speaking of adventures, Brooklyn Boulders was hailed by Vogue as the “Best workout in Brooklyn.” With 22,000 square feet of climbing surface and with locations in New York, Boston, and Chicago, campers will find an unconventional experience to engage their imaginations and push them to their physical potential.

There are also camps focusing on different aspects of a child’s development, including religious traditions. Jewish Community House of Bensonhurst is a camp that quickly becomes a yearly tradition and important aspect of many campers lives. Their programs are known to promote close-knit relationships, explore the rich history of Judaism, and promote the social, emotional, and physical growth of each camper.

Stony Creek Farmstead, in Walton, upstate New York, offers a special experience for both campers and parents in a picturesque landscape. The farm is owned and operated by three generations of the Marsiglio family, and is known for their free-range and organic practices when it comes to meat and produce. The farm has luxurious platform tents, where many families from Brooklyn and Manhattan come stay and send their kids to the day camp while the adults can chill out or go antiquing. This year they are also offering an adult camp, workshops for adults, some running throughout the season and other mini workshops that will be offered during the kids day camp.

 

Stony Creek Farmstead

 

As a writer from the East Coast of Canada, I have had my fair share of summer camp experiences out in the New Brunswick wild. I didn’t necessarily focus on my writing skills at any camp I went to, though I might have been interested in that. Instead I followed my penchant for theatre and was keen for anything that could let me be creative. The embracing of my creative side developed the part of my brain that can imagine in many situations, including writing and creating stories out of thin air. While putting together the list of New York camps through my Canadian eyes, I understood that this is, of course, to be expected of the Big Apple; it has everything, even when it comes to summer camps. Kids can sign up to learn about almost anything including musical theater, art, or even their own religion or ethnicity. The amazing thing is there are camps to support kids in almost every facet of their lives and development, including their social, intellectual, artistic, and physical selves, with many focusing on developing the whole person, physically, mentally and spiritually. I think this is important — here’s why:

The time when the idea of summer camp is important is once in a person’s lifetime — more specifically, only at one major growth stage. At a certain point, you do grow up and are simply too old to go to summer camp and can only then participate as a camp counsellor (which could have its own merits and learning points). Seizing this opportunity while the time is right is a great idea. Being able to say you were a ”camper” means simply that you got to grow, you got to do things differently from during the school year, and you practiced making new friends, a skill that will likely stick around with anyone for a good long time. At the ‘camper’ point of development, we are at our most impressionable. Being in a summer camp can teach resilience, cooperation, and artistic or athletic abilities which leaves a lasting impact. Through these activities, kids find what they’re good at or who they really are. Having the freedom to just be a child — without any concerns or responsibilities away from the usual school schedule — means that kids can focus solely on fun, and this is when learning and development can become fluid, easy, and effortless.

During my own summer camp experience, I was able to learn a few things about myself I didn’t come to know during the school year. When put in a new situation with a bunch of kids, I was uneasy. Would I get to know all these people or even make friends with them? I was unsure, as I wanted to cling to my school-year friends. But people being people, we do each slowly learn to trust each other, and so did I. Suddenly the girl with the red hair and freckles had a name and a funny personality. Suddenly after about five days and nights of being away from parents, I didn’t feel like I needed them to tell me what to do quite as much. My routine was replaced by new traditions like meal hall, swimming, and canoeing, adoring older boy counselors, and sharing nightly snacks. As campers, we realized we could still thrive and develop, maybe more rapidly, in a different world where we all suddenly belonged.

For many, the hardest part of camp is the end, breaking up of the unique camp community leaving the now-familiar personalities, and saying good bye — at least until next summer.

A camper’s usual, everyday personality can be slowly broken open to reveal someone who is brave enough to try archery, bold enough to sing by a campfire, and passionate enough to belt out their team chants. A camper can grow to become someone who sleeps in a bunk bed, and knows how to tough out bugs and sunburns. Being at a summer camp, whether it’s for a day, overnight, or for a week-long sleep-away program, means that kids get the chance to be someone new. They get to live in a new environment or just experience a new situation, and to the best of their ability, thrive. Life is about growing up alongside and needing our parents, but camps allow children to experience life, no matter how long or how briefly, on their own. This can create a sense of self-knowledge and self-esteem that can create an important foundation for personal growth. Sure, campers may need to call home occasionally or even switch out of a camp which isn’t right. But having the chance to find a place to fit in and belong, that will be worth the time, the effort and the experience to grow. For as campers, we can be who we want to be without the adult worry of being who we’re supposed to be. That can be left until a later stage, and another time.

Filed Under: A Camping We Will Go Tagged With: Brooklyn, kids, Park Slope, Summer camp

DISPATCHES FROM ALBANY: THE READER INTERVIEW

May 10, 2017 By Mirielle Clifford Filed Under: The Reader Interview Tagged With: election, local politics, Park Slope, State Assembly

The Reader Interview with Assemblymember Robert Carroll

Spring of 2017 has been a tumultuous time for the New York State Legislature. Having missed the deadline to pass a new budget, the Assembly and the Senate voted for an emergency extender budget. This placeholder, in effect until May 31, prevented a shutdown of the state government but left many questions unanswered.

In the midst of this uncertainty, and between votes on the Assembly floor and meetings with colleagues, Assemblymember Robert Carroll was kind enough to speak to me in early April. Assemblymember Carroll, elected in 2016, may be new to the Assembly but not to politics. He has been involved with the Park Slope Civic Council, Community Board 7, and was the youngest President of Central Brooklyn Independent Democrats. He now represents Assembly District 44.

Our conversation touched on the concerns of his District, the Young Voter Act—a bill Carroll crafted in collaboration with three Bard High School students and that would, if passed, lower the New York State voting age to 17—and Raise the Age. Raise the Age is an unnecessarily controversial effort to ensure that individuals under the age of 18 will not be prosecuted as adults for non-violent offenses. As of this writing, the Assembly has voted to raise the age, but the Senate has not.

Assemblymember Carroll’s take on how young voters, and young people, should be treated reveals his faith in the ability of the community to determine what’s best for the whole. As the story of Kalief Browder—a young man whose life and death speaks to the necessity of Raise the Age—becomes more widely known, one can hope that the resolution of this issue will no longer be considered a roadblock to the passage of a budget, but, as Carroll calls it, “a necessary good.” Albany could certainly use a bit more of Carroll’s optimistic practicality.

 

Robert Carroll speaking on the assembly floor.

 

What do you hope to accomplish for your district in your first term?

Originally I was hoping that we were going to be able to pass a progressive and transparent budget, one that prioritizes New York City public schools, our infrastructure, and also making sure that necessary services to our senior centers were fully funded, as well as bigger picture items, like raising the age of criminal culpability to 18 from 16, making sure we bring electoral reforms to the state of New York, and that we open up our election process.

[pullquote]Time will tell which bills will pass, and which ones won’t, in the New York State Legislature this year, but one can only hope that future legislation will build “towards a more just and fair society.[/pullquote]Obviously we’re still having these big picture conversations; raising the age is still a necessary good, and hopefully we will get it by the time this is published. It’s a reform that will make our society more just. It’s something that is right, makes sense, and is practical. It has hit a lot of roadblocks, and that’s one of the reasons why we don’t have a state budget. Whenever you’re trying to reform a system, or whenever you’re trying to change something, there are always people who are inherently afraid of that change and will not want to go and do it.

I am looking forward to still working on those issues, and making sure we find ways to bring about real electoral reforms. That’s something I’ve done as an attorney and worked for as an activist and I think is necessary.

 

New York state is one of two states where a person 16 years of age or older can be automatically prosecuted as an adult. At the same time that Raise the Age is front and center in Albany, you’ve introduced the Young Voter Act to lower the state’s voting age from 18 to 17. Does our state need to change the way it looks at young people in general?

Yes. On the one hand, our outlook is paternalistic towards young people. On the other, when people make mistakes early on, we can brand them for life, putting them in a system that will basically make it impossible to right their life. This impacts communities in a whole host of ways, for generations. The Assembly bill for Raise the Age is not saying that there aren’t repercussions for violent, heinous crimes; it’s not stopping somebody who has killed or raped someone from facing real serious repercussions. The Assembly bill addresses cases where, for example, a young person commits a burglary that is non-violent, but because that crime is categorized with other violent crimes, they’re treated like an adult and could possibly do years and years in prison and have a felony record to their name. No one is condoning that action, but if we put a 16 or 17 year old in prison for years, it only hurts the rest of us.

It’s going to be harder for that person to reintegrate into society as a functioning individual, and become employed. That creates other burdens for society. That person could commit other crimes, could go on some form of public assistance, they could lose their relationships with family and friends and become disconnected. It reverberates throughout and hurts communities. That’s why Raise the Age is so important.

 

Speaking to PTA leaders.

 

And it couples directly with lowering the voting age. Some people think, ‘shouldn’t they be the same? If someone is not mature enough be tried as an adult, then surely they’re not mature enough to vote.’ That’s a false choice there, because Government tries to reinforce good habits all the time.

By lowering the voting age to 17, all students can at least vote once before they go to college, or go out in the world to work. So we foster that habit. Then it’s on them, to continue to participate. But we jumpstart that person’s engagement in civic and political life. There’s a lot of good research out there that if you start voting before you’re 25, you’re very likely to become a lifetime voter. If you start voting after you’re 25, you’re not likely to. That was in The Economist back in February. In 1972, over 50% of people 18 to 25 voted in that year’s presidential election. In 2012, it was around 38%. We’re seeing this steady decline in youth participation in elections, but we want to reverse that and help people become regular voters.

And you’re not a regular voter if you only vote every 4 years for president, and if you’re not voting in local elections: midterms, State Assembly, State Senate, City Council, and mayoral and gubernatorial elections, and also primaries in New York. Most elections in New York City and in the suburbs are decided in the primaries. Most years in New York you can vote almost every year, once in September, and once in November. We’re going to have a big election in New York City in September for all those citywide offices, and a general one in November. We’ll also be voting on a constitutional convention.

We need people to participate in all of these elections. I’m a big believer that the whole collective, the group, is rather smart, and in tune with what’s going on. I’m not cynical. There are some people who believe that voters aren’t intelligent, that they’re easily manipulated by power brokers, or will only vote in accordance with certain aspects of their identity. If they’re young, then they’re easily swayed by their parents. I don’t believe any of this. Voters do tend to go towards issues that are better suited for the whole. All elected officials should be trying to get as many people out there to vote as humanly possible. It’s simple – we’ll get better outcomes when more people vote.

 

What has most surprised you about being in the Assembly so far?

There are days when you feel progress is being made, and that you’re moving forward. And then there are days when you feel there are entrenched forces all around and nothing will change. That kind of dichotomy, where it can switch on and off, can be frustrating. You can feel very heartened one day, and completely frustrated the next day. The other surprising thing—which is somewhat amorphous and hard to pin down—from day to day those things can be almost the same. You can have a person surprise you from one day to the next. You might say to yourself, ‘I never thought this person or this organization would champion this issue,’ and then you think, ‘Why is that person now doing this?’ You forget it’s three-dimensional, with different parts moving.

There are some really good things that the New York State Assembly and the Legislature has done lately, from minimum wage, to stopping hydrofracking. But with something like Raise the Age, you wonder, ‘why can’t we figure this out?’ The Assembly is very good on it, but the Senate is being pretty difficult on it right now. Why can’t we come up with something that’s reasonable? It’s not an unreasonable point to make, or issue to bring to the forefront.

So overall, it’s not as great as it is on its best day, nor is it as bad as it is on its worst day.

 

The 44th District is pretty diverse. How do you balance your different constituents’ needs?

My district is wonderful. We’ve got Park Slope, Windsor Terrace, Kensington, Victorian Flatbush, Ditmas Park, parts of Borough Park, and a little bit of Midwood. There are people who are very new to Brooklyn, who have just moved into all parts of my district from far and wide. There are some people moving to Park Slope, Victorian Flatbush, and Windsor Terrace who are maybe professionals with means and money. Some people are moving to Kensington and Coney Island Avenue from Pakistan and Bangladesh. There’s a large Orthodox Jewish population in Borough Park, and in the district there are also people of Irish, Italian, and Puerto Rican descent who have have been here for years and years. I grew up in the district, in Windsor Terrace and Kensington. Brooklyn is the only home I’ve ever known.

There are multigenerational homeowners here, and immigrants, and people who are brandnew who might be called gentrifiers. That’s the way neighborhoods are created in New York. If you’re a New Yorker, you understand the city is always in flux. And when you get down to the core issues, people are worried about the local subway station, the local public schools, making sure the neighborhood is safe and affordable and that city services are working.

A great thing about this district is that a lot of people are concerned about building towards a more just and fair society. It’s not just purely a matter of, ‘what the government is doing for me.’ They understand that we’re all in this together and that we need to bring everyone along with us.

 

Reading to children at Windsor Terrace library.

 

The previous Reader Interview: http://www.psreader.com/issue/issue-59/the-reader-interview/enriched-landscapes-the-reader-interview-with-susannah-c-drake-on-cleaning-up-the-gowanus-canal/

Filed Under: The Reader Interview Tagged With: election, local politics, Park Slope, State Assembly

Slope Survey: John Tucker

November 25, 2016 By Mirielle Clifford Filed Under: Slope Survey Tagged With: Brooklyn, Park Slope, Rose Water

Restaurateur, devotee of local, seasonal food, and one of Edible Manhattan’s “Dads We’re Loving,” John Tucker was the perfect fit for the Slope Survey’s third installment. Here, the owner of Rose Water muses on a changing Park Slope, getting away, and the surprising qualities that make a hero.

 

What brought you to Park Slope?

I’m as Slopian as they come: my wife and I came over the bridge in 1999 with a two-year-old in tow, looking for square footage, green space, good school, and a community of like-minded tree-huggers. We checked every box, and within months many unexpected benefits appeared, like the Food Coop, and the notion that the neighborhood might support a restaurant like the one I opened in 2000.

What is your most memorable Park Slope moment?

Rose Water’s opening day was big, but not specifically a Slopey moment. My most memorable moments are about coming together as community – happy times in the park at Celebrate Brooklyn and the PopUp dinners, or Halloween and baseball parades. Even sad gatherings, such as grieving together at Beth Elohim over the tragic loss of a wonderful boy. Handing out food at Green and Healthy Night at PS 321, and watching kids perform at MS 51 with Mr. McEneny’s drama department. There’ve been many, many memorable moments for me in my village.

A good day for you is…

I own and operate a long-running Park Slope business that I’m proud of, and I help run a Brooklyn non-profit youth soccer program. A good day includes both, and also watching my sons play soccer. But, in the summer when the kids are away, my best days are spent upstate, swimming in the Plattekill Creek with my wife and our dog.

Describe your community superpower.

I’m very fortunate to have had the time and energy to be a volunteer youth sports coach, referee, and administrator for many years. And I’m proud to be considered an asset to my community as a small business owner that supports local schools, charities, and nonprofits.

If you could change one thing about the neighborhood, what would it be?

Diversity. When I moved to Park Slope in 1999 there was more racial, ethnic, and cultural diversity, which was a big draw for me. New York City is still a vibrant and wondrous place, but less interesting than when I arrived from Detroit in 1986. Particularly in this contentious election season, I’d love to be in charge of a magic wand that promotes tolerance, inclusion, and understanding.

What do you think Park Slope will look like in 10 years? in 20 years?

Wet? Hopefully it’ll be many decades before the Gowanus Canal stretches from Fourth Avenue to Hoyt Street. Meanwhile, I worry the neighborhood will continue to lose interesting mom-and-pop shops in favor of chains, and become more pricey and even less diverse. I hope I’m wrong, because I want to keep living here.

What were your childhood nicknames?

Johnny.

What is your greatest extravagance?

I raid the Rose Water wine cellar fairly frequently and drink well above my life station. Or, perhaps it’s my “country house,” which is a travel trailer that never travels—it sits on a campsite near Saugerties, New York.

If you couldn’t live in Park Slope or in Brooklyn, where would you go?

Besides Provence? A barrier island on the Gulf Coast of Florida that has no bridge, no cars, no roads, no commerce, and a beautiful, mostly unpeopled beach where I like to look for shark’s teeth. I also love the Catskills, and I could see myself in all those places, but I refuse to imagine not having a home in Brooklyn, too.

Who is your hero, real or fictional?

My dog. We never disappoint each other, he’s never told a lie, and he’s always reliably and irrationally pleased to see me. Mostly, I feel like people are too human to be heroes. That said, I think ALL educators are the bomb!

 

RW_PSReaderAdRev

 

Check out the last Slope Survey: http://www.psreader.com/issue/issue-57/slope-survey/slope-survey-elise-long/

Check out our website: http://www.psreader.com

 

Filed Under: Slope Survey Tagged With: Brooklyn, Park Slope, Rose Water

A Slice of Life

November 16, 2016 By Beth Kaiserman Filed Under: Eat Local Tagged With: cheese, cheese pie, grandma, la villa, Park Slope, pino, pizza, plain, roma, Sicilian, slice, wood-fired oven

The pizzamakers of Park Slope

There’s nothing quite as satisfying as a tasty slice of New York pizza. I chatted with three local pizzeria owners about why they do what they do, how the neighborhood has changed and what their favorite slice is.

Lorenzo Scotto, Pino’s La Forchetta, 181 7th Avenue

Lorenzo Scotto, or “Larry,” has been involved with Pino’s since 2005.

“Almost 12 years,” he said. “Wow, fast. Ohmygod, time flies.”

Pino’s opened in 1962. They had another store in Staten Island, which his father recently sold, before the Brooklyn location. The biggest change since 2005 is from lots of walk-ins to way more delivery with Seamless and Grubhub.

“I think that made people stay inside all day,” he said. “They don’t wanna move; they just play with their phones and that’s it.”

Pino’s actually had its own delivery app for a while, but even with a 10% discount, people still used Seamless and Grubhub. Of course visiting a pizzeria has its own perks, including the potential for a freshly made pie right out of the oven.

“We just try to make it fun; service with a smile—we try very hard for it,” he said.

“People ask for crazy things though. Sugar is a weird one. A sprinkle of mustard before baking?—Too far. Ketchup; I could understand once in a while, but mustard?!” he said.

Business-wise, this year was “exceptionally crazy,” he said, partly due to the snowstorms closing roads in the winter. But it’s been consistent otherwise, and new locations are definitely possible, probably in New Jersey or downtown Brooklyn.

lorenzo-larry-at-pinosThe pizza: “Old school straight up pizza.”

Preferred slice: “Me personally I like regular and Sicilian – plain. I like the plain just regular old style.”

Drink with a slice: “I’m addicted to water.”


William Rubin, La Villa Pizza, 261 5th Avenue

La Villa has been in the neighborhood for 13 years. The biggest change Rubin has noticed is that people are here to stay, he said.

“There’s more people making this home and sticking around and settling in,” Rubin said.

There are two other La Villa locations, one in Mill Basin and the other in Howard Beach in Queens. The Howard Beach one opened over 32 years ago. Another location in Dyker Heights is on the way.

Rubin said La Villa had the first wood-burning oven in Park Slope when they opened.

“We actually flew out to Seattle, where they make the ovens, and we did a test kitchen. We brought our own water and flour and then we came back and made a decision to put wood-burning ovens in here. The other locations now have wood-burning ovens … I wondered what it was like transporting buckets of water through airport security. This was about 15 years ago though, probably right before 9/11″, he said. “What’s the sense in using Seattle, Washington water when that product could be different? The water is 50 percent of the product.”

His business partner’s mother is from Italy and works at the Howard Beach shop. A lot of the recipes come from her family.

“We try to represent an authentic Italian feel as much as [we can] being an American restaurant,” he said. The restaurant keeps the menu consistent, updating it maybe once per year, he said. They do have daily specials starting at 4pm.

william-rubin-from-la-villaThe pizza: “Wood-fired oven pizza. Personal and large size. Pizza cooked to high heat and charred to perfection. You’re not gonna get a lightly baked pie if you don’t ask for it that way.”

Preferred slice: “Grandma slice; anything with pepperoni on it I can eat. I go traditional; I don’t go out of the box.”

Drink with a slice: “Coke. I like a coke and a slice.”


Phil Castellano, Roma Pizza , 85 7th Avenue

Phil Castellano’s father owned a pizzeria on 5th Ave. when he was a kid. His family is Sicilian. Back then, the neighborhood was very different.

“5th Avenue was horrible. You couldn’t walk on 5th Avenue past sundown,” he said.

It was particularly scary running a business there, especially since all the businesses were cash-only back then. In 1982 they opened Roma on 7th Ave. His pizzeria is still cash-only today.

“That’s just the way it was, and no one really changed it. Now, people get a real kick out of it. It’s like going back in time,” he said.

Castellano remembers playing outside when he was nine or 10 and sneaking away to eat a whole pizza pie himself. There was no doubt he was going to go into the family business.

“Women were seamstresses, and men were cooks,” he said.

The same recipes from his father’s shop are used at Roma today. The shop now has a liquor license and serves more meals like veal, mussels, clams and handmade soups.

filippo-castellano-from-roma-pizzaThe pizza: “Traditional, classical NYC street pizza. What the city is built on.”

Preferred slice: “Regular and Sicilian. Those are our biggest sellers.”

Drink with a slice: “I drink a lot of water. Coke occasionally.”

Filed Under: Eat Local Tagged With: cheese, cheese pie, grandma, la villa, Park Slope, pino, pizza, plain, roma, Sicilian, slice, wood-fired oven

The Perfect Party

November 9, 2016 By Nicole Kear Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: birthday, childhood, children, Halloween, holidays, parenting, Park Slope, party

Madonna dance-off. Limbo contest. Cannoli cream cake. 

Year after year of my childhood, that was the formula for my birthday party, which took place in the basement of my Staten Island home. It was a three-prong party plan that worked. Well, four prongs, really. Just before the cake was served, came the Chaplin-esque birthday cake pratfall, courtesy of my father. He’d walk down the stairs to the basement, carefully holding the cake box aloft, only to stumble at the bottom, throwing himself down the last few steps and tossing the box extravagantly into the air. The crowd would gasp, and he’d jump to his feet, open the box and reveal that IT WAS EMPTY! Ha! Ha HA! No need to worry, the cannoli cream cake was intact, upstairs.

So:

Madonna dance-off.
Limbo contest.
Father pratfall.
Cannoli cream cake.

After the age of 11, I could have done without the pratfall, but generally speaking, it was a good party. The formula worked. I am reminded of this as I enter the winter, also known as Kear Family Birthday Season. Three kids. Three birthdays. Lots of headaches.

I’m not the sort of parent prone to observing wistfully, “Things were so much simpler when we were kids.” First of all, of course things were simpler. We were kids.  Really, though, I’m just not terribly interested in adjudicating which time period was better/ easier/ simpler/ less stressful. The circumstances of our lives and our world are too fluid to make it a satisfying enterprise. Besides, since I’m not the proud owner of a time machine, there’s not much I can do about it anyway.

If I were that sort, though, I’d definitely observe that birthday celebrations were simpler when I was a kid. Of course, it might just be that birthday celebrations were, and are, simpler when you inhabit a living space in which more than 260 square feet is allocated to each family member (yes, I’ve done the math).

We just don’t have the space to host a birthday celebration at home. This is the party line.
It is part true and part me playing the NYC No Space Card.
“No space” is the golden excuse that comes free with your exorbitant rent in New York City.  I’d say it’s one of the hidden perks except that I think it’s the only one. Regardless, it’s a goody.
Unwanted house guest angling to crash at your place?
“I wish we could but we just don’t have the space.”
Your spouse planning to purchase some hideous piece of furniture on the level of When Harry Met Sally’s wagon wheel:
“I wish we could but we just don’t have the space.”
Your child begging for a dog, or a baby brother:
“I wish we could but we just don’t have the space.”
The No Space card is so valuable it almost makes up for not having any space.

But the truth is, even if I had all the space in the world, even if I lived in Staten Island, I would try to get out of hosting a kid party. Because of the cleaning.

It’s not that I’m against cleaning. For an adult cocktail party, I’d happily scour my bathroom like Joan Crawford in Mommie Dearest. But tirelessly cleaning my apartment, top to bottom, only to have a horde of children obliterate it again, within minutes, has always seemed to me a task that only a dupe like Sisyphus would take on. The pointlessness demoralizes me.

For these compelling reasons, I’ve avoided hosting parties at our apartment for over a decade. This would have been impossible financially – since paying for a kiddie birthday party in Park Slope costs what weddings do in other parts of the country – except that my grandmother’s apartment building happens to have a party room.

The party room is the hero of this tale. The party room, spacious and clean and practically free, has made it possible to celebrate my children’s birthdays …  not to mention baptisms, first holy communions, Halloweens and whatever random holidays they’ve had a hankering to observe.

We’ve thrown so many birthday parties at the old party room that my husband, the kids and I are nothing short of a well-oiled party machine. We can set up a party in a tight fifteen minutes if need be.

My husband does streamers. It has taken him years to perfect his streaming technique, and to describe it would be to reveal trade secrets I am not at liberty to disclose. Let’s just say his moves are as intricate as a Simone Biles floor routine: double stranding and full twists and three-point-anchoring. It’s not for novices.

The kids are on balloons. Thankfully, they’ve spent their whole lives training their lungs for the task. At least, that’s what I surmise all the yelling was for.

I set up the folding tables with juice and snacks and paper products. I hang up the charming homemade birthday signs. I spread age-appropriate art supplies and activities in key locations around the room.

Then David turns on the music and the party is on.

We’ve perfected the party the way you nail down anything, through trial and error

PInata?

No, oh no, never again.

Karaoke machine?

Yes, indeed, well worth the investment.

Finding the right number of guests has involved a learning curve, too. Instructive, indeed, was the year I let my daughter invite everyone her heart desired and everybody came, creating a level of mayhem not witnessed since the sinking of the Titanic. She ended up hiding under the table, in tears.

Then, only a month later, there was the party for my other daughter, in which we catapulted to the other end of the guest list spectrum. So eager was I not to repeat my over-inviting mistake, that I severely under-invited kids. That’s not exactly accurate. I invited all the kids in her day care class. I just intentionally threw the party at a time when I knew no one would be able to come. It worked. Only two guests made it. The three toddlers ended up overwhelmed in the large room and I couldn’t handle the strain of having to make conversation with the two parents in attendance. My daughter ended up under the table, in tears. I felt like joining her.

Of course, no sooner did we stumble upon the perfect party formula then the kids outgrew it. Now that my older kids are tweens, it’s all about the sleepover birthday party. And sleepovers, I have found, can’t be shot on location. They are not an away game. You can’t outsource sleepovers. You have to have sleepovers at your house.

I have tried to play the No Space card, but my kids are old enough now to play their own cards. The Guilt cards. The Childhood-Is-So-Fleeting-And-Before-You-Know-It-You’ll-Wish-We-Were-Still-Taking-Up-More-Than-Our-Allotted-260-Square Feet Card.

I’ve got nothing that can trump that one.

And so we begin a whole new trial and error process. Which, I guess, Is parenting in a nutshell.

Nicole C. Kear is the author of the memoir Now I See You (St. Martin’s Press, 2014). Her chapter book series for children, The Fix-It Friends, will be published by Macmillan Kids’ Imprint in spring 2017.

Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: birthday, childhood, children, Halloween, holidays, parenting, Park Slope, party

Park Slope Votes

November 2, 2016 By Meghan Cook Filed Under: Community Tagged With: community, Democratic, election 2016, feminism, GOP, Park Slope, party, Republican, voters

Every four years November acts as a pivotal month in our nation’s political calendar. The months of lively debate leading up to the election often cause tensions to flare in communities across America, and never has an election stirred up controversy and vitriol as much as this one has.

Yet, despite all of this, the majority of local residents seem squarely unified against a particular candidate in the running for the future President of the United States. It should not come as a surprise, that in a community as diverse and unique as Park Slope, that a certain resentment would be felt towards Donald Trump — a man who has distanced himself from nearly every minority group with reliably divisive rhetoric.

There are a number of Americans who admire Trump for saying what others won’t, and for not shying away from the more turbulent areas of conversation that most politicians avoid. But there are also those who find this mindset distasteful.

“I don’t like Donald Trump, especially for the Mexican people,” said Luis Correa, 64, local resident and taxi driver. “He speaks poorly of us.” Correa identifies as an Independent but he finds himself drawn towards Hillary Clinton, finding her likable and attentive. “She works for honest, hardworking people. She works for my community.”

For many, the upcoming election results are cause for concern, with supporters on both sides keeping their nominees aloft in the polls. But for Correa, the future is clear. “I’m not worried,” he said firmly, rapping his knuckles decisively against the top of his taxi cab. “Hillary Clinton will be our next president.”

img_9171Lizette Chaparro, 26, works for a non-profit affordable housing company and is a proud Democrat. She said that her party has “long championed the well being of the working class and has reached out to communities of color.” She plans on voting for Clinton come fall, “for obvious reasons.” She is genuinely a supporter of Clinton’s policies and calls her “the most experienced candidate running for office,” but she also is driven by a desire to “make sure Donald Trump doesn’t end up in the White House.”

Chaparro also praised Clinton for championing women’s rights. “As a future mother, I worry about equal pay and maternity leave,” Chaparro said. “If Hillary Clinton wins the White House she’ll do a lot for working women. She’s very focused on giving women equal rights and opportunity in the workplace.”

img_9165David Hoffer, 58, is a computer technician who has been a Democrat for his entire life. He believes in the Democratic party because “they seem to care more about people and want to truly do good for us.” He paused for a moment before admitting, “At least most of the time.”

Hoffer expressed his discontent with the current voting system in place. “It’s all gone digital. I know technology progresses, we all progress, but if you look at any other field where technology is a large component – there’s always going to be people who try to supersede the rules. It’s too easily hackable; it’s hard to challenge discrepancies.” Hoffer said frustration in the voting system is nothing new, referencing the Florida election recount of 2000 and the controversy over hanging chads, stating that gray areas such as this hamper true democracy.

When asked about his thoughts on Trump as a presidential nominee, Hoffer could not help but laugh and respond, “Where to begin? I think he’s the biggest pathological liar and bigot there is. The fact that so many support him makes me wonder about our country.” For Hoffer, his vote is less a personal choice and more about choosing the lesser of two evils. “I’m not a big fan of Hillary, but choosing between the two? No question.”

riyana-dasguptaLocal graduate student Riyana Dasgupta, 23, believes that this election has “struck a chord with many people for a variety of reasons” and that it is much more than a popularity contest. “The presidential candidates’ policies and character brings out the morality of their supporters,” said Dasgupta. “And I think this election has a lot to do with morals, in addition to electing a new Commander-in-Chief.”

Dasgupta described Clinton and Trump diplomatically, stating that, “One of the candidates has well thought out policies, a solid temperament, and a positive character that can truly enact change in this country. The other candidate, however, has policies that have the potential to do more harm than good and a quick, haughty temperament.”

However Park Slope residents personally felt towards either candidate, each expressed encouragement in every American’s right to vote. “I would like to see more people, older and younger alike, come out and vote,” said Dasgupta. With support mounting on both sides, whether passionate or resigned, this election in particular will ride on the citizens who actively stand in line for the voting box come November 8th.

Filed Under: Community Tagged With: community, Democratic, election 2016, feminism, GOP, Park Slope, party, Republican, voters

Slope Survey: Elise Long

September 13, 2016 By Mirielle Clifford Filed Under: Slope Survey Tagged With: community, dancing, neighborhood, Park Slope, q&a, resident, Spoke the Hub

EliseHaitianArt1For our second Slope Survey—inspired by Marcel Proust and his eponymous questionnaire—we turned to longtime Park Slope resident and Founder/Director of Spoke the Hub Dancing, Elise Long.

What brought you to Park Slope?  I was living on the Lower East Side in the late 70s. My fiancé felt it was too unsafe and refused to join me there; maybe it was, but it was all I could afford. We then received a brunch invitation from friends renting a brownstone floor-through on Prospect Park West. It felt like a mansion, with stained glass windows and beautiful woodworking. It wasn’t much more expensive than my tiny, roach–infested hovel off Avenue A with the bathtub in the kitchen and toilet in the hall. Also, considering the amenities of Prospect Park, the library, Botanic Gardens, BAM, the Brooklyn Museum, and relatively cheap rents (yes!), our decision to cross the river was a no-brainer, a decision I’ve never regretted. What is your most memorable Park Slope moment? My most memorable moment in recent times, which happened to be in Park Slope, was that gorgeous blue-skyed morning of 9/11: first hearing the sirens, then watching the smoke and towers tumble from my roof, searching for lost friends, lining up (and being turned away) at Methodist Hospital where I tried to offer my rare O negative blood, and the following unsettling days and weeks. I was—and still am—grateful for my steadfast Park Slope community of friends and neighbors. A good day for you is … Minimal time on the computer! Describe your community superpower.  I think I’m pretty successful at bringing diverse communities together and persuading reluctant bodies of all ages onto dance floors to do the Brooklyn boogaloo. If you could change one thing about the neighborhood, what would it be? Less real estate offices and nail salons, please. That’s two things, but you get my drift. What do you think Park Slope will look like in 10 years? in 20 years?  How I’d like the neighborhood to look is different than how I think it will actually look. 4th Avenue will probably be like Park or Madison Avenue, flanked by a Grand Canyon of giant building complexes. But hopefully there’ll be more green spaces and mature trees to balance those concrete citadels. What were your childhood nicknames? I have always had to put up with “Carrot Top/Gingy/or Hey Red!” from strangers. My mom still calls me Leela, don’t ask me why.  What is your greatest extravagance? Orchestra seats at BAM every now and then. Or traveling around the world. I’m saving up for Bhutan.  If you couldn’t live in Park Slope or in Brooklyn, where would you go? I can’t imagine NOT living in Park Slope, but I spend a lot of time in Philly. I do love all the rivers, parks, history, and public art works gracing that fair city. I also feel like I could be the love child of Isaiah Zagar, the manic mosaic creator of the Magic Gardens, so maybe I have legitimate Philly DNA. Who is your hero, real or fictional? As a kid, Abe Lincoln was my imaginary “friend” and most-admired hero. We must’ve been studying the Civil War in school and he caught my imagination. I used to take him on imaginary tours around our house in California to show him modern day conveniences. I’d show him our kitchen faucets—wasn’t it amazing that we had hot running water on demand? I told him if you put a letter in the mailbox, it’d end up at Grandma’s house across the country in a few days. I demonstrated the use of zippers, telephones, washers and dryers, radios, and TV’s. He was very impressed, and I was pleased to impress him with all these modern day inventions and quality of life “things” we as a people had produced post-Reconstruction. After reading Team of Rivals as an adult, he became my hero all over again, but I no longer give him house tours.

Filed Under: Slope Survey Tagged With: community, dancing, neighborhood, Park Slope, q&a, resident, Spoke the Hub

There’s No “They”

August 23, 2016 By Mirielle Clifford Filed Under: The Reader Interview Tagged With: Alice in Wonderland, Brooklyn, events, free, history, July, King Lear, Old Stone House, Park Slope, performance, Piper Theatre, showcase, summer, The Iliad

THE READER Interview with Kim Maier on our Cultural Patrimony

The Old Stone House has been many things a baseball clubhouse, a warm place for nineteenth century gentleman to gather after iceskating, a casualty of urban blight, a rallying cry that brings neighbors together, and now, a vibrant public space. In May, I spoke with the Executive Director, Kim Maier, about the Old Stone House’s summer programming, its history, and its commitment to accessibility in a changing Brooklyn.

Maier in front of the Old Stone House, which proudly displays a Maryland flag. Credit: Mirielle Clifford
Maier in front of the Old Stone House, which proudly displays a Maryland flag. Credit: Mirielle Clifford

What’s happening at the Old Stone House this summer? 

As Park Slope’s town square, we’re always trying to create great programming. In July we open with our annual summer programming with Piper Theatre. Our Equity Showcase production is Psycho Beach Party by Charles Busch, which is a fantastic take on the early 60’s beach blanket bingo movies, looking at different views on gender, personality, and psychosis. These Equity Showcase Productions have been a wonderful way for us to support young emerging Equity actors, and non-Equity actors as well, and to bring a high quality of performance to an actor’s space that’s not usually accessible.

The Piper Theatre workshop shows are also very exciting. We’re doing two musicals this summer: Blood Brothers and Joseph and the Technicolor Dreamcoat, along with Alice in Wonderland, Beastmaster, and King Lear, which will be directed by Rob Parker from Scotland’s Gordonstoun School. The younger kids are doing The Iliad and The Odyssey.

You have an exhibit on view in the gallery until June 20, called “Partners/Parents/Pets.”

Our goal is to create a lot of avenues for entry and to attract a really wide audience. We have our history exhibit which focuses on life in 18th century Brooklyn. But we also have three contemporary shows a year looking at everyday life in Brooklyn, like our current, contemporary portraiture show.

The show considers who gets to have their portraits painted and explores the link between economic privilege and art. Does the House explore this theme often?

One thing we focus on here is access. We’ve looked at park space and play space, how parks are developed and how land is taken, how parks are maintained—based sometimes on the economic levels of communities—and how vocal community participation can lead to good public programming. Though that’s something any community could take on, it tends to happen in more affluent communities where people feel they have a voice. So we try to encourage people everywhere to have a voice, and set a model that can be replicated in any community.

In a 2014 interview with the Park Slope Stoop, you said “The Battle of Brooklyn today is a battle for a sense of place.” Do you think that battle has changed since then?

It’s the same. The history of New York is one of constant development and continuous change. But for me, having lived in Park Slope since 1983, it used to be a community of writers and artists and was much more affordable. It’s still a wonderful family community, but not as accessible to the creative class. I think a lot about Brooklyn and its sense of itself as a creative community, and how we can continue to support that.

How do you view the Old Stone House’s position in that “battle”?

The park’s improvement has created a lively, welcoming public space that allows for a very heavy level of interaction, from handball and soccer to concerts. In one space, you’re able to access a lot of different kinds of activities that aren’t necessarily available elsewhere … not to mention the fabulous history.

Creating a beautiful space is for the benefit of the many. The few benefit more richly, in a way. But working to benefit the larger community through accessible programming is one way of balancing out the inevitable facts that if you create a beautiful park, the housing around it will flourish, more people will want to live here, and that creates an economic impact that might shut other people out. It’s hard. We’re very aware of it, and that’s partly why we do a lot of free or low-cost public programming.

The Old Stone House couldn’t fix that economic issue.

Right. We support affordable housing and we’re focused on issues of income inequality. But we can’t change the fact that the city is Supply and Demand.

And always has been.

Since 1683.

Have you always been interested in Revolutionary history?

I grew up in Massachusetts and probably visited every historic home on the Eastern Seaboard, but I wasn’t really interested in pursuing history. These historic homes were off-putting. I never had a sense of the families that lived there. The issue of class was never directly addressed. You never got a true look at how the economy of these homes was managed. I remember thinking at Monticello that that beautiful site was run on the backs of enslaved people. That was certainly never talked about when I was a kid.

Coming in here, it feels warm, welcoming, and lively. But how would you address a reader who’s thinking, “hmmm, an historical house … maybe not.”

You should always feel free to walk in the door, because these public institutions are yours. They’re supported by all of us through our tax dollars, by individual donations, and by our programming. They belong to all of us. They’re our cultural patrimony. Today more than ever, this idea of engaged citizenship is really important. The Revolution was the start of that. The Battle of Brooklyn was fought by people who came from all over to fight for an ideal they had no idea was going to evolve and triumph, but they came anyway.

The House was the clubhouse for the original Brooklyn Dodgers, right?

Yes. The Brooklyn Baseball Club had a few different names—the Bridegrooms, the Superbas—but they were all part of this corporation that became the Dodgers. Hopefully, in our next phase of exhibit development, we’ll be able to do an outdoor exhibit on our baseball history.

By 1883 there was a ballfield here, a big grandstand, and an elevated train. By the late 1800s, the ballfield had fallen into disrepair, and they built a new one, which they used for ice skating. They would flood the field in the winter and skate by gaslight. The House, still in its original location, was both the clubhouse for the baseball team and also the gentleman’s club for winter skating. But it had gotten quite decrepit. By the time they had finished using the field, they were climbing in and out of the windows to get in.

Gradually the tenements along 5th Avenue were built up, and the House became a fill site. It was still used for recreation, though. Buffalo Bill’s Wild West Show came through. It was a very active open space, with a really active working-class community.

Has anything in the House’s history surprised you?

I’m surprised it fell into such disrepair. When it was originally built in the 1930s, it was a Robert Moses-Jane Jacobs kind of smackdown because Moses wanted to build this playground as part of an enormous expansion plan. Residents who knew the site’s history wanted a formal memorial to the Maryland soldiers who had taken a stand here. Moses was not interested in this kind of preservation at all. But they persevered and made him compromise by digging up the foundation stones and constructing this building that mimicked the original. But like so many other parts of the city, the House went by the wayside and was really destroyed. It wasn’t until the late 1980s, when a small group of neighbors came together and lobbied the Borough President for funding, that it was repaired. If not for them, this whole history would have disappeared. When I moved to this part of the neighborhood in 1991, I had no idea of this site’s history. I was a typical user in a lot of ways. I was surprised by the disrepair, too, given that the Battle of Brooklyn was the first official battle fought by the United States Army in August of 1776.

Do you have any advice for the “typical users” of Brooklyn on why it’s important to preserve Brooklyn’s historical sites? How can they help?

We’re responsible for the well-being of our communities. There’s no they—we are the voters and the engaged citizens. If you care about the cleanliness of your block, the stability of your home, or the giant development coming in, you need to pay attention to what’s going on around you.

It doesn’t require going to every community board meeting. But it behooves you to read the local paper, to meet your neighbors, and to understand who lives on your block. In the end this is your home. The reasons you moved here will only continue to exist if you take responsibility for it.

As I left the Old Stone House, I was grateful to have been reminded of what engaged citizens can achieve.

Filed Under: The Reader Interview Tagged With: Alice in Wonderland, Brooklyn, events, free, history, July, King Lear, Old Stone House, Park Slope, performance, Piper Theatre, showcase, summer, The Iliad

SLOPE SURVEY

June 21, 2016 By Mirielle Clifford Filed Under: Slope Survey Tagged With: bicycles, Brooklyn, Dixon’s Bicycle Shop, Dr. D’s Lounge, interview, Marcel Proust, neighborhood, Park Slope, Survey, Union Street

DAVE DIXON

For our first Slope Survey—inspired by Marcel Proust and his eponymous questionnaire—we reached out to Dave Dixon, co-owner of Dixon’s Bicycle Shop and D’s Lounge. Dixon’s, which has graced Union Street for 50 years, is Park Slope’s oldest family-owned bike store. It seemed only fitting that Dixon help us kick off the Survey.

What brought you to Park Slope? I was born in Brooklyn, and my parents bought a brownstone in Park Slope. What is your most memorable Park Slope moment? My most memorable moment in Park Slope would be running home from my Dad’s shop, while a gang fight was getting ready to start in the middle of the street. This was in the mid ‘70s. A good day for you is… A good day for me is being able to fix bikes. Describe your community superpower. Just keeping busy, making sure that everyone is pleased with my service and that everyone can get to their next destination. If you could change one thing about the neighborhood, what would it be? I would set up more fun things for kids and grownups to do. What do you think Park Slope will look like in 10 years? in 20 years? In 10 to 20 years, I think the Slope will look a lot more crowded, with all the new buildings going up. What were your childhood nicknames? One of my childhood nicknames was the Butcher because of my big appetite. What is your greatest extravagance? Probably my bicycle collection. If you couldn’t live in Park Slope or in Brooklyn, where would you go? If I couldn’t live in Brooklyn or the Slope, I would love to live in Jamaica or Miami or South Beach. Who is your hero, real or fictional? I would have to say my Dad. I have so much respect for him, and my mom for what they have done for the family.

DaveDixon_Bikefor2

 

Filed Under: Slope Survey Tagged With: bicycles, Brooklyn, Dixon’s Bicycle Shop, Dr. D’s Lounge, interview, Marcel Proust, neighborhood, Park Slope, Survey, Union Street

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to page 5
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

The Summer 2025 Issue is now available

The Reader Community

READER CONTRIBUTORS

Copyright © 2025 · Park Slope Reader