• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Read An Issue
  • About
  • Advertising Information
  • Where to Find the Reader
  • Subscribe to our Mailing List
  • Contact Us

Park Slope Reader

  • The Reader Interview
  • Eat Local
  • Dispatches From Babyville
  • Park Slope Life
  • Reader Profile
  • Slope Survey

winter 2021

Dispatches from Babyville: Dear Subway

January 9, 2021 By Nicole Kear Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: dear subway, Dispatches from Babyville, Nicole Kear, winter 2021

Dear Subway, 

It’s been a while since we’ve seen each other, I know. Nine months, to be exact. In the period of time since my last ride, I could have gestated a human life. I’ve gestated human lives on three different occasions so I know how long of a span that is. It’s an eternity.

I know you’re still there, just like you used to be. I can feel the vibrations of your rumbling, four stories below me when I sleep. And I know you’re pretty safe to ride. I’ve heard the positive reports of mask compliance. It’s not that I’m intentionally trying to avoid you. It’s just that I have no place to go. Where would you even take me? 

My life has become hyper-local. I barely even leave my zip code anymore. Park Slope has everything one might need, though not everything one might want. But, these days, no one’s getting what they want, and plenty aren’t getting what they need either. So, I’ve relied on my feet to take me where I have to go. It’s worked well enough. Except . . . 

I miss you, subway. 

I miss your velocity. I miss your density, even. I miss your rattling, your thundering, your lurching. I miss indecipherable announcements. I miss “Stand Clear of the Closing Doors.” I miss darting through those closing doors with my kids, and telling them the story of my friend Carli, from high school. How, on our afterschool commute one day, she did not stand clear of the closing doors, so they slammed shut on the straps of her backpack and her super-long banana-colored hair. The train zoomed out of the station, with her hair and her backpack on the outside of the car. Carli thought it was hilarious. She did high kicks like a Rockette. 

“Mom, you’ve told us that story a hundred times,” my kids would 

 say. 

“I know, “ I’d always reply. “But it’s a good story.” 

Subway, I miss your chance encounters, your platform churros, your candy purveyors. I miss your potentiality, the assurance that absolutely anything could happen. 

I do not miss your track rats. I hate rats. 

I also do not miss the mysterious piles of feces on your platforms, which I always tell myself are animal turds, even though I suspect they are of human origin – and what’s the difference really, right? Except, well, there is a difference. 

Still, even with your rats and mystery feces, subway, I can’t wait until I see you again. 

I’m sitting here, trying to think of my favorite moment we’ve shared. The most memorable moment by far, was when my son, known in these parts as Primo, my daughter, Seconda and I were leaping onto a G train, coming home from Cobble Hill. Just as we were jumping on, a passenger scrambled to get off. At the time, I wasn’t sure why he was rushing out of his seat with such urgency but a moment later, it became clear, when he vomited directly onto 7-year-old Primo’s T-shirt. The passenger made it off, the train doors closed, and Primo, looking down at his chest, let forth a bloodcurdling, horror-movie scream. We still think twice before getting on the G train. 

I also don’t miss the subway vomit. 

Our relationship has spanned four decades and it’s hard to pick a favorite moment. In my childhood, I had eye-opening moments of discovery. In my adolescence, I had up-to-no-good moments. In my twenties, I had cinematic rom com moments. But my favorite . . . 

Do you remember the afternoon in early spring, four years ago, when I got on the R train to take Seconda to get her very first pet? She was nine, had been begging for a hamster for months, and finally, I’d relented. We were en route to the Union Square Petco and she was in high spirits, bouncing up and down in the orange plastic seat, chatting a mile a minute. When a subway performer got on somewhere around City Hall, she was delighted. As we rumbled into the Prince Street station in Soho, he played “Raspberry Beret” and the passengers came to life, clapping and whooping; Prince had died only weeks before. 

One of the things I love most about you, subway, is that there is nothing more intoxicating than sharing a collective moment shared in the tight, dense, no-exit space of your train car. Most often, it’s a collective annoyance we feel – when the train car slows to a stop in a tunnel and the conductor assures us we will be moving shortly, but we know that shortly is a relative term if ever there was one. Passengers sigh, grumble, exchange exasperated glances. The irritation is shared by all. We are together in this. 

Occasionally, that collective moment can be upsetting. I’ll never forget the homeless woman who walked into my train car a few years ago, asking for money, only to be ignored by all. 

“Look at me!” she yelled, her voice raw and urgent. 

No one looked. 

“I’m a human being!” she yelled. “And you’re animals! Animals! All of you!”

It was a heavy moment, weighted with guilt, shame, fear, complicity — and we were together in that moment too. 

But that spring afternoon on the train to Union Square, the collective moment was anything but heavy. We were floating – my daughter on the wings of anticipation and me, on the satisfaction of making her happy. 

“She wore a raspberry beret,” the busker crooned, leaning on a pole. “The kind you find in a secondhand store.”

We clapped, we laughed and in doing so, we memorialized the musical giant who was gone, but not all the way gone because here was his music, very much alive, providing a Prince Street soundtrack. 

As we pulled out of Astor Place, the performer, having finished the song, collected tips from passengers, including my daughter. He saw her bright smile and he returned it with a massive grin of his own — the kind we never get to see anymore because of masks, 

“This one’s for you,” he told her, as he started strumming a set of familiar chords.  

“I’ve got sunshine,” he sang, looking straight at her. “On a cloudy day.” 

My daughter glanced up at me, her electric blue eyes twinkling. “Are you getting this?” they said. 

I put my arm around her shoulders and squeezed. I was getting it. 

“When it’s cold outside,” he crooned. “I’ve got the month of May.” 

Maybe people were still riding the wave of good feeling from “Raspberry Beret” or maybe it was the huge gap-toothed smile that took over Seconda’s face, or maybe it was just that the singer was singing the hell out of the song, pouring himself into it, all of him. Either way, people clapped along. 

“I guess you’d say,” he sang, “What can make me feel this way?” 

He stopped strumming, pointed at Second and sang a cappella. “My girl, my girl, my girl” 

My girl — our girl — giggled, a giggle so effervescent it could’ve powered a hot air balloon. 

I have never been more in love with this city, my always and ever city. I’ve never been more in love with you, subway, 

I was with my girl, and I was with my fellow New Yorkers, too. Despite the many, incessant forces that keep us apart, we were all together in this moment, a perfect, magical moment that could never happen anywhere else. It couldn’t happen in a Walmart, or a strip mall. It couldn’t happen in an elevator, or on a street corner, or in a bodega. It could only happen on a New York City subway. 

One day soon, we will meet again. I’ll swipe my Metrocard, descend a dingy staircase, avoid mysterious fecal matter, steer clear of the rats. I’ll wait for the train, with my indomitable, impatient New Yorkers and when it comes, I’ll think of Carli and I’ll stand clear of the closing doors. 

I can’t wait for that velocity again. That freedom. 

Until then, 

Fondly,

Nicole 


Artwork by Heather Heckel

Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: dear subway, Dispatches from Babyville, Nicole Kear, winter 2021

The Battle for 227 Abolitionist Place, part two

December 24, 2020 By Kara Goldfarb Filed Under: Feature, Park Slope Life Tagged With: Black Lives Matter, kara goldfard, winter 2021

In This Fight to Preserve History, Black Lives and Black Landmarks Matter

READ PART ONE HERE

In mid July, the Landmark Preservation Commission of New York City held a public hearing. It took place over Zoom due to the Coronavirus Pandemic. It it had been in person, it would have been a packed room. For nearly three hours, members of the community gave testimony in support of Item 1 on the docket, LP‐2645, also known as the proposal to give landmark status to 227 Duffield Street.

The battle for 227 Duffield Street has been ongoing (a deeper history is chronicled in part one of this series.) During a virtual Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) meeting at the end of June, the commission calendared 227 for an official hearing on whether it should be given Landmark Status. They then set that hearing for just two weeks later. It may sound fast-moving for those familiar with NY bureaucracy standards. On the other hand, those who have had a stake in this fight might say it took closer to two decades.

In her testimony during the hearing, the Attorney General for New York, Letitia James, said, “I’ve been involved in this effort to preserve 227 Duffield Street,” before stating that the building is “actually known as 227 Abolitionist Place.” As previously reported, Duffield Street was renamed Abolitionist Place in the Fall of 2007 to commemorate the numerous buildings and people on the block active in the anti-slavery movement during the Civil War era. As for 227, the building was the home of two prominent abolitionists named Harriet and Thomas Truesdell, and is long thought to have been part of the Underground Railroad. That same year, the building was saved from demolition when its owner Joy Chatel (lovingly known as “Mama Joy”), narrowly won a court settlement in which the city agreed the property wouldn’t be taken by eminent domain as part of the Downtown Brooklyn Development Plan. However, the LPC’s decision to not landmark the home left it vulnerable for future developers to try the same thing again. And that’s exactly what’s happening now.

So what’s happened between now and 2007?

In 2014, Joy Chatel passed away. A longtime champion of 227 Duffield’s preservation, Chatel was responsible for drawing many activists and organizations to the cause. Leading up to the 2007 settlement, Chatel and Lewis Greenstein— whose property on Duffield Street was also at risk of being seized and was also thought to be part of the Underground Railroad, formed the Duffield Street Block Association. They also connected with the activist group Families United for Racial and Economic Justice.

Of those who spoke during the recent July hearing, few went without mentioning “Mama Joy” Chatel in their testimonies. “She treated me like a son. Her compassion is why I’m here right now,” said Local activist Raul Rothblatt. In her fight to save 227 Duffield, Chatel created a legacy of her own. “I believe her history should be included in the LPC designation of 227 Duffield,” said Rothblatt.

In 2017, Samiel Hanasab, a developer, brought the property under an entity called 227 Duffield Street Corp. And as feared when the building was initially rejected for Landmark Preservation Status, Hanasab applied for a demolition permit in the summer of 2019, citing plans to replace the two-story building with a 13-story mixed-use structure.

Though Chatel was no longer there, the momentum she helped build had not lost steam. Those still dedicated to 227’s preservation held a rally outside of the Landmarks Commission building on Centre Street in Manhattan in August 2019. In a Facebook event, organizers called it an “Emergency Rally” and provided instructions on how to contact Lisa Kersavage, the LPC’s Executive Director. As it Read:

“Tell her:

– Please do not demolish 227 Duffield Street, located in Downtown Brooklyn
– We need to landmark 227 Duffield, because it is well-documented that it was used as a meeting house for the abolitionist movement as well as a stop on the Underground Railroad.
– We strongly believe that the site needs to be turned into a museum to preserve this important historic contribution to the fight against racism in the US.”

Calendaring a building for consideration is the first official step the LPC takes in granting it Landmark Status. The Buildings Department had approved Hanasab’s demolition permits, and the LPC hadn’t calendared the Duffield home. So the sense of urgency was palpable. And the campaign persevered on. A petition was created, a GoFundMe page was set up, and the marches continued.

On February 22 of this year, during Black History Month, activists organized another rally outside the Barclays Center. Together they held a large sign that read, “Black Landmarks Matter,” with the hashtag #Save227Duffield. On May 25, 2020, almost exactly three months later, George Floyd was killed.

In that June meeting that took place over Zoom, the LPC voted on calendaring 227 Duffield Street. The decision to do so was unanimous.

And that led to the July hearing.

Of the dozens of people who spoke and wrote letters, there was one who testified on behalf of Hanasab: His lawyer, Garfield Heslop. Heslop asserted that “no one is more attuned to historical significance of the building as we are” and that “part of the development of the property was the creation of a museum that would honor the legacy of the building.” Rothblatt, however, disagreed, stating that “the new owners have never reached out to any of the historical advocates.” He added, “We have a vibrant community of people willing to save this history and they have not shown any interest in that…as far as I can tell they’ve had contempt.”

The hearing was a monumental step in this story. And, as the outpouring of support it received made evident, one that many have been waiting on for a long time. It was maybe best summated by a man named Michael Henry Adams from Harlem, who was there at the beginning. Adams said, “I’m gratified by the outcome today, finally, after 17 years.” But he didn’t neglect to mention the kind of destruction that can be done when steps aren’t taken to preserve important landmarks in a timely manner. Referencing recent comments made by Mayor de Blasio about systemic racism throughout city departments beyond the Police Department, Adams said he hopes this designation can be an acknowledgement that, “justice delayed is justice denied.”

The timelines of the LPC hearing as it converged with the George Floyd protests was undeniable. “Of course Black lives matter, of course, Black landmarks matters,” Adams said, continuing, “They matter because Black people are not just Black people. We are Americans. we are the people who built this nation and so our history is second to none.”

Filed Under: Feature, Park Slope Life Tagged With: Black Lives Matter, kara goldfard, winter 2021

Primary Sidebar

The Spring 2025 Issue is now available

The Reader Community

READER CONTRIBUTORS

Copyright © 2025 · Park Slope Reader