• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Read An Issue
  • About
  • Advertising Information
  • Where to Find the Reader
  • Subscribe to our Mailing List
  • Contact Us

Park Slope Reader

  • The Reader Interview
  • Eat Local
  • Dispatches From Babyville
  • Park Slope Life
  • Reader Profile
  • Slope Survey

Dispatches from Babyville

Dispatches From Babyville: Lunch Duty

November 28, 2018 By Nicole Kear Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: Department of Education, Dispatches from Babyville, lunch, lunchboxes, Nicole Kear, school

Eternal summer is a dream when you’re a kid. When you’re a parent, not so much. Every year, the final week of August drags on interminably, just like the final week of each of my pregnancies, and I find myself wondering, “What if Labor Day never comes? What then?” So, when dawn breaks on the first day of school every year, I am full of wonder and gratitude. I want to kiss the Department of Education full on the lips.

The only thing that tempers this relief is the stack of lunchboxes on the kitchen counter. 

“Remember us?” the lunchboxes seem to hiss. “We’re baaaaaaack.”

 Really, it’s one lunchbox in particular. The one belonging to my six-year-old daughter, known in these parts as Terza. 

Terza is what’s commonly referred to as a picky eater, though “picky” is too demure and dainty a word to describe the iron-willed resistance she shows to consuming anything besides candy, crackers and pizza.

She has always been a discerning eater, even in the womb. She was so small in the sonograms, my obstetrician suggested I drink a milkshake daily to fatten her up. For the past six years, I’ve felt like a prince in a fairytale, only my quest is not to make the princess laugh, but to make the princess eat. Dinner and breakfast are hard enough but lunch, especially at school. is nearly impossible. 

It’s a classic case of getting a taste of your own medicine. I, too, was a finicky eater. 

My mother likes to recount how, when I was the age Terza is now, the only thing I’d bring to school for lunch was bread and water. 

“Like a prisoner!” she exclaims. 

I figured my mother could probably have stumbled upon an alternative to the prisoner meal, if only she’d tried a bit harder. This is the kind of asinine conclusion one makes before one has kids. When faced with Terza’s pickiness, I vowed to resolve the issue by trying hard, being creative and above all, listening to her input. 

“What would you like for lunch at school tomorrow?” I asked her. 

Once we worked through the unhelpful responses, “School? Don’t tell me I have to go to school again!” we arrived at the outlandish, “A hamburger and pasta with bechemel sauce.”

“How about mac and cheese?” I asked, searching for a feasible facsimile.

“Okay,” she replied. Convincingly, I should add. So I prepared mac and cheese in the morning and scooped it, fast, into her Thermos, so it would stay nice and hot for lunch. 

In the evening, when I unscrewed the Thermos lid, I found it full. Chock full. Brimming over. The Thermos was so full, it looked like she’d added macaroni. 

“You didn’t take a bite of your lunch!” I said.

“Mommy,” she replied. “I hate mac and cheese! Why did you put it in my lunchbox?” 

I’m sure she didn’t mean to gaslight me. Still, I was tempted to record our conversations to play back for her later. Nonetheless, the important thing was figuring out what to pack for tomorrow.

“Nothing,” she said. “I hate lunch.” 

“How about a cream-cheese sandwich?”

“Fine,” she agreed.

Of course, when I picked up Terza from school the next day, her lunchbox was full and her stomach was empty. She was ravenous. 

“Please, Mommy, can I have a bagel?” she begged, rivaling Oliver Twist in pathos. “I’m . . . just . . . so . . . hungry. I feel faint!”

 I procured her a bagel. I am an Italian mother after all. I am wired to feed children.

Watching her devour the bagel, I proposed that maybe she might enjoy a bagel in her lunchbox tomorrow,

Naturally, she agreed.

You don’t need to be Sherlock Holmes to deduce what happened next. 

No matter what went in the lunchbox, it was returned uneaten. I began to suspect that Terza had a Magic Lunchbox. A Dark Magic Lunchbox. It made delicious things repellant. Except, strangely, for cookies. Those are immune. 

The solution was clear. School lunch. She didn’t eat that either–found it even more distasteful than anything I could prepare–but at least I didn’t have to toil over a steaming stove at 7 in the morning only to find the fruits of my labor untouched. School lunch seemed like a perfect solution to my problem, if not to hers. But the problem with parenting is your kids’ problems, really, are your problems too. Eventually, her pleading wore me down. 

“Please, Mommy, can’t you make me lunch?” she’d beg. “Don’t you want me to eat?”

Finally, I did the only thing I knew worked with picky eaters. Bread and water. 

In my defense, I added a peach. 

Because the peach was never eaten, I just left it in the lunchbox, day after day, whether from optimism or laziness, I’m not sure. Day after day, I persisted in my war of attrition with the peach. Day after day, I watched it grow more bruised and mangled. Finally, I could take it no longer. I euthanized the poor fruit. And I quit packing lunch. 

I am a determined person who tackles problems pro-actively, believing that with enough stamina and flexibility, one can find a solution to any conundrum, no matter how thorny. I am a person who is sometimes wrong. 

As a parent, of course, you have to keep trying. Or at least, someone does. Which is why I decided to pass the baton to my husband. 

“Here,” I said, handing over the Dark Magic Lunchbox. “Good luck.”

“What should I pack?” he asked, innocent that he was. 

I smiled. “Why don’t you ask her?” 

Nicole C. Kear is the author of The Fix-It Friends, a chapter book series for children (Macmillan Kids), as well as the memoir Now I See You (St. Martin’s Press).

Art by Heather Heckel

Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: Department of Education, Dispatches from Babyville, lunch, lunchboxes, Nicole Kear, school

Dispatches From Babyville: SLIME!

August 14, 2018 By Nicole Kear Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: Dispatches from Babyville, Nicole Kear

Re: SLIME

That was the subject heading of the email I received from my son’s middle school about a year and a half ago. I was perplexed. 

I was familiar with the word “slime.” One might use it in all sorts of contexts, especially in relation to snails, or the sludge found in the corners of showers. But I was confounded as to why the middle school would be sending an e-blast about it. 

By Nicole Caccavo Kear, art by Heather Heckel

“Please be advised that the possession or selling of slime is prohibited at school,” the email read, before going on to detail the consequences for slime infractions.

I had so many questions. What kind of slime were we talking about here? And why would a kid want to collect it, take it places and, most inscrutably, sell it?  Also, even if they did, why would the school have a formal position on it? 

I read the email to my husband, and we laughed about it.

“At the end of the day, it’s just slime,” I chuckled. “What could be so terrible about slime?”

There is an Italian proverb my grandmother is fond of using when I’m laughing about something that’s no laughing matter. “Ridi, ridi, che la mamma ha fatto i gnocchi.” It means, “Laugh, laugh, your mom made gnocchi.” Okay, so it’s one of those lost-in translation kinds of things, but the message is: “Go ahead and laugh, you moron! We’ll see who’s laughing soon.” 

It’s an apt proverb to use here as I think of myself a year and a half ago, ignorant about the slippery slope of slime. Laugh, laugh, your kid made slime.

It wasn’t my 7th grade son that succumbed to the slime craze. It was my 4th grade daughter, affectionately known in these pages as Seconda. 

“Mom,” she said after school one day, a few weeks after the enigmatic email. “Can I make slime?”  

Ahhh, I thought, this mysterious slime again. 

“Why?” I asked.

“Because it’s fun,” she answered. Then, sensing that this truthful response wasn’t hugely compelling to a parent, she added: “It’s science! Mixing stuff up.” 

The classic parental Achilles Heel – an educational activity that is just as fun for kids as it is enriching.  Extra points if it relates to math or science.

“Well,” I said. “How do you make it?”

She explained that it was super easy and there were tons of recipes on the internet – all you needed was glue, shaving cream and Borax. 

“You mean, the stuff you clean clothes with?” 

She looked at me like I was a headless kangaroo: “How should I know?” 

The aspect of laundering Seconda’s responsible for is clothing transport – moving the wet clothes to the dryer and the dry clothes to the folding station (AKA my bed). Considering the percentage of clothes that end up on the floor in the process of transport, I don’t think she’ll be promoted to detergent–dispensing any time soon. So, she doesn’t know Borax from Borat.

“I don’t think you should be playing with Borax,” I said. “It seems dangerous.” 

She paused, then said: “Yeah, some kids have been getting chemical burns.”

“WHAT?” I shrieked. It’s unsettling as a neurotic parent when the worst-case-scenario you’ve cooked up ends out being an under-estimation. “If you knew that, why’d you ask me to use it?” 

She shrugged. “I forgot.” Then she added. “But don’t worry, because we can use contact lens solution instead.” 

“That’s good,” I said, trying to imagine ways that contact solution could harm a child. It had the benefit of being engineered expressly to be put in the eye, so that was a definite plus. 

Unable to think of potential bodily harm caused by saline solution, I agreed. That was the beginning of it all.  Slime, like a vampire, has to be invited in. 

Seconda assured me the process would be easy and she could do it all on her own. I didn’t argue. I am sure there are moms out there who enjoy supervising science experiments but I am not one of them. So I accompanied her to get the supplies and then left her to it.

Within about fifteen minutes, there were disquieting noises coming from the kitchen. It wasn’t beakers exploding, but tempers. 

“This is SO dumb!” my daughter yelled. “It DOESN’T WORK!

I walked into the kitchen and gasped. The word “mess” doesn’t come close to describing it. I am reminded of a story I heard, about a Youtube sensation who made a music video using large quantities of chicken hearts. The mess produced was so epic that the cleaning person hired took one look, walked straight out of the house and never came back. It was an unsalvageable mess, one you simply abandon. I think the chicken hearts are still there. This was my reaction upon entering the kitchen after Seconda’s inaugural slime mission.  It hadn’t been a science experiment so much as a battle between her and the glue. The glue won. By a landslide.

“Well, that’s the end of that,” I said after the kitchen was cleaned.

I’ll pause as we both laugh at my naivete.

Because, of course, failing to successfully make the slime only intensified my daughter’s yearning to get it right. A few weeks later, she started begging for another shot, taking a different tack. She reasoned that it was an activity we could do together — mother/ daughter bonding time! Mother/ daughter bonding science time! Did she mention she might want to be a neuroscientist when she grew up? Plus, she’d read that playing with slime was very therapeutic. It helped with stress and anxiety. 

“What helps with the stress and anxiety caused by the slime, though?” I asked. “That’s what I want to know.” 

You don’t need to be Stephen King to put this story together. 

The Slime Kraken had been unleashed. Eventually, I thought, this will get boring. After all, there are so many truly fascinating things that get boring so quickly for children; how could this – the combining of glue, shaving cream and contact lens solution – have unending hypnotic appeal? And yet it does. Maybe it’s because there’s limitless varieties of slime – from the obvious (fluffy slime) to the surprising (snow slime) to the nauseating (butter slime). It seems that you can make slime out of virtually anything – provided it is messy, and hard to get off a carpet. I bought my Kindergartener a pack of Model Magic and was glad to see Seconda partake in the art fun. A few minutes later, I saw her kneading her portion of Model Magic into one of her countless slime vats. 

“What?” she said when I gave her a look. “It makes super spongey slime.”

Her level of fixation is straight-up King Midas. I wouldn’t be surprised if I caught her trying to turn her sister into slime. 

The trouble with slime is, once you get rid of the Borax, it’s hard to point to what’s objectionable about it. Sure, there’s the mess, though this can, with enough rules born of trial-and-error, be contained. Seconda has waged the battle with the glue enough times that she’s able to win it more often than not, and my kitchen doesn’t need to be abandoned like a chicken-heart-strewn-music-video-set. 

Sure, there are slime accidents, and I have, on more than one occasion, stepped right into a sticky, gooey pile of glue gunk on my living room floor. Then I’ll banish slime for a while. and that works, for a few weeks . . . maybe months. Banishing always seems like an easy fix but read Romeo and Juliet or Sleeping Beauty and you’ll see how well it works out. Especially when the thing you’re banishing is mess. Because, when dealing with kids, when is there not a mess? Pretty much only when they’re plugged into screens — which is a whole other ball of wax. 

Maybe the reason the slime craze is so irritating is that I can’t fathom its appeal. 

“Why?” I’ve asked Seconda. “Why do you love slime so much?”

“It’s so satisfying,” is always her reply.

 There couldn’t be a more vague description of its allure. I just don’t get it. 

Which, I guess, means I’m officially the parent of a tween. 

Nicole C. Kear is the author of the chapter book series for children, The Fix-It Friends (Macmillan Kids). You can find more info at fixitfriendsbooks.com

 

Illustration by Heather Heckel

Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: Dispatches from Babyville, Nicole Kear

Playing House

February 22, 2016 By Nicole Kear Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: child raising, comedy, Dispatches from Babyville, dollhouse, family, family relations, humor, parenting, Park Slope

For Christmas last year, my daughters got a dollhouse. By New York City standards, it’s really more of a doll mansion than a house. Four stories, massive terrace on the second floor, private garage, and a charming two-person swing hanging from an attached archway. Every time I look at the dollhouse, I imagine what the doll version of our real apartment would be, an exercise that only depresses and demoralizes me. No parent would buy that doll-apartment—except maybe for New York City parents, because, after all, it would be a space-saver.

My girls love their dollhouse. I love their dollhouse. It fulfills my real estate dreams and allows me to realize my housekeeping aspirations. Because while I don’t have a shot in hell at keeping my real house tidy, I keep an immaculate dollhouse. 

My three children are humans (as far as I know) but their effect on our home is not like that of humans. It is like that of weather. Bad weather. Ruinous weather. Hurricanes. Tornadoes.

The eye of the storm is my three year-old, Terza. Her messes are not just epic, but Homeric. I’d be impressed by their breadth and ambition, if I wasn’t so busy having a nervous breakdown.

Terza is an upender. Before selecting a pair of socks, she needs to upend the entire bin and ponder all of her choices spread out before her. Ditto with the underwear and the pants and the shirts—and the toys. She upends packs of crayons, containers full of ponies, tubs of beads, packs of cards, boxes of blocks. Apparently, it takes so much energy to upend everything that there’s none left to put it all away. I try to get her to clean up, I really do. But being a savvy third child, she knows that more often than not, if she stalls long enough, we’ll eventually have to rush off to pick up or drop off a sibling, and by the time we get home, it’ll be past her bedtime and I’ll be so fried and ready for all three-year-olds to be asleep, that I’ll “put a pin” in her mess which is to say, send her to bed and clean it up myself.

[pullquote]Every night, the dollhouse looks as if it has been ransacked by a gang of thugs or has just hosted five simultaneous frat parties.[/pullquote]

The older kids—my daughter, eight and son, ten—no longer create state-of-emergency messes.  With the big kids, the mess is less a downpour and more a steady, unrelenting drizzle. They move through the place, constantly dropping personal belongings everywhere, like Hansel with his breadcrumbs—only for no good reason. Hairbrushes, socks, markers, books, headbands, and always, everywhere, endless pieces of paper. I’m surprised they have time to get anything else done, so busy are they picking up items and depositing them in a new location.

I’m surprised I have time to get anything done, so busy am I nagging them constantly to “Put this back where you found it!” and “Put your dirty clothes in the hamper!” and “Put these clothes back in your drawer and don’t you dare put them in the hamper because you wore them for five minutes and they are about as dirty as a Mister Rogers episode!”

On bad days—snow days, or worse, playdate days —it takes hours to wrestle our house into order again. Even on our best days, it takes a full hour– and even then, it’s not clean enough that I’d invite Child Protective Services—or my mother—over. I can never get our house clean. The most I can hope for is that it appears habitable.

But it takes mere minutes to make the dollhouse immaculate—no matter how anarchic the mess. And it does get anarchic in there.

When my girls play in the dollhouse, their dramas are not your usual “family” fare.  More often than not, they play with animals, many of which are feral. This results in much stampeding and charging and attacking—which wreaks havoc on a domicile. Even when they play with people, their dramas are tragedies of a very physical nature. Doctors are constantly being sent for because characters are inevitably wounded, sometimes fatally. There is also quite a lot of dancing that goes on in the dollhouse—dancing which brings the roof down, literally.

Every night, the dollhouse looks as if it has been ransacked by a gang of thugs or has just hosted five simultaneous frat parties. The furniture isn’t just overturned; it’s overturned in the wrong room. The fridge is in the master bedroom, the bunk beds are in the kitchen, the sofa’s on the terrace. Most disquieting of all, the charming two-person swing is off its hinge and lying on its side a few feet away.

So, every night, I groan and sigh and shake my head. And then, ignoring the mess in my actual home, I kneel down and set about tidying up the dollhouse. I don’t have to clean the dollhouse, but I want to. It calms me the way a glass of wine or evening yoga might calm a less crazy person.

Cleaning the dollhouse takes about three minutes. I return the master bed to the master bedroom, the fridge to the kitchen, the sofa to the living room. I hang the charming two-person swing on the charming archway created for this express purpose. The dollhouse is not just habitable. It is flawless—ready for its flawless family to move in.

I place the dollhouse Mom on the sofa, the dollhouse Dad in the armchair and the dollhouse child in her bed. Sure, it’d be fun to give her a push in the now-functional swing but it’s night and at night—in the dollhouse at least—children sleep. They do not run into the living room at 3 a.m., demanding marshmallows and begging to watch Mickey Mouse.

Cleaning up my dollhouse reminds me of how well I used to parent, before I had kids. I was the absolute best mother when my kids were just figments of my imagination. I was patient and consistent. Fun but firm. I knew the answer to every question and exactly what to do in every situation. When I was a parent only in my day dreams, I never yelled, never caved, never doubted myself.

My imaginary children were paragons of obedience and self-regulation—they always cleaned up after themselves. They never bickered or whined or raised their voices. They watched absolutely no TV and ate absolutely all their vegetables. They always minded their manners and never minded sharing. They did everything I told them to, just like the dolls in the dollhouse.

Of course, my imaginary kids never surprised me. They never caused me to snort with laughter. They never made me feel like I was having a cardiac episode from such intense feeling—joy and terror and gratitude and wonder, all at the same time.

I remind myself of this as I turn my attention from the perfectly-ordered dollhouse to my real living room. I remind myself as I sweep up crushed Cheerios and load the dishwasher. I remind myself as I put dirty shirts in the hamper and fish out clean ones that somehow found their way in there.

I think about how it’s good to have a dollhouse to dream in and a real house to live in. A person needs both.

 


 

Nicole C. Kear is the author of the memoir Now I See You (St. Martin’s Press, 2014) and the forthcoming series for children, The Fix-It Friends, out in early 2017 from Macmillan Kids. 

Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: child raising, comedy, Dispatches from Babyville, dollhouse, family, family relations, humor, parenting, Park Slope

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2

Primary Sidebar

The Spring 2025 Issue is now available

The Reader Community

READER CONTRIBUTORS

Copyright © 2025 · Park Slope Reader