• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Read An Issue
  • About
  • Advertising Information
  • Where to Find the Reader
  • Subscribe to our Mailing List
  • Contact Us

Park Slope Reader

  • The Reader Interview
  • Eat Local
  • Dispatches From Babyville
  • Park Slope Life
  • Reader Profile
  • Slope Survey

Nicole Kear

Dispatches From Babyville: Lunch Duty

November 28, 2018 By Nicole Kear Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: Department of Education, Dispatches from Babyville, lunch, lunchboxes, Nicole Kear, school

Eternal summer is a dream when you’re a kid. When you’re a parent, not so much. Every year, the final week of August drags on interminably, just like the final week of each of my pregnancies, and I find myself wondering, “What if Labor Day never comes? What then?” So, when dawn breaks on the first day of school every year, I am full of wonder and gratitude. I want to kiss the Department of Education full on the lips.

The only thing that tempers this relief is the stack of lunchboxes on the kitchen counter. 

“Remember us?” the lunchboxes seem to hiss. “We’re baaaaaaack.”

 Really, it’s one lunchbox in particular. The one belonging to my six-year-old daughter, known in these parts as Terza. 

Terza is what’s commonly referred to as a picky eater, though “picky” is too demure and dainty a word to describe the iron-willed resistance she shows to consuming anything besides candy, crackers and pizza.

She has always been a discerning eater, even in the womb. She was so small in the sonograms, my obstetrician suggested I drink a milkshake daily to fatten her up. For the past six years, I’ve felt like a prince in a fairytale, only my quest is not to make the princess laugh, but to make the princess eat. Dinner and breakfast are hard enough but lunch, especially at school. is nearly impossible. 

It’s a classic case of getting a taste of your own medicine. I, too, was a finicky eater. 

My mother likes to recount how, when I was the age Terza is now, the only thing I’d bring to school for lunch was bread and water. 

“Like a prisoner!” she exclaims. 

I figured my mother could probably have stumbled upon an alternative to the prisoner meal, if only she’d tried a bit harder. This is the kind of asinine conclusion one makes before one has kids. When faced with Terza’s pickiness, I vowed to resolve the issue by trying hard, being creative and above all, listening to her input. 

“What would you like for lunch at school tomorrow?” I asked her. 

Once we worked through the unhelpful responses, “School? Don’t tell me I have to go to school again!” we arrived at the outlandish, “A hamburger and pasta with bechemel sauce.”

“How about mac and cheese?” I asked, searching for a feasible facsimile.

“Okay,” she replied. Convincingly, I should add. So I prepared mac and cheese in the morning and scooped it, fast, into her Thermos, so it would stay nice and hot for lunch. 

In the evening, when I unscrewed the Thermos lid, I found it full. Chock full. Brimming over. The Thermos was so full, it looked like she’d added macaroni. 

“You didn’t take a bite of your lunch!” I said.

“Mommy,” she replied. “I hate mac and cheese! Why did you put it in my lunchbox?” 

I’m sure she didn’t mean to gaslight me. Still, I was tempted to record our conversations to play back for her later. Nonetheless, the important thing was figuring out what to pack for tomorrow.

“Nothing,” she said. “I hate lunch.” 

“How about a cream-cheese sandwich?”

“Fine,” she agreed.

Of course, when I picked up Terza from school the next day, her lunchbox was full and her stomach was empty. She was ravenous. 

“Please, Mommy, can I have a bagel?” she begged, rivaling Oliver Twist in pathos. “I’m . . . just . . . so . . . hungry. I feel faint!”

 I procured her a bagel. I am an Italian mother after all. I am wired to feed children.

Watching her devour the bagel, I proposed that maybe she might enjoy a bagel in her lunchbox tomorrow,

Naturally, she agreed.

You don’t need to be Sherlock Holmes to deduce what happened next. 

No matter what went in the lunchbox, it was returned uneaten. I began to suspect that Terza had a Magic Lunchbox. A Dark Magic Lunchbox. It made delicious things repellant. Except, strangely, for cookies. Those are immune. 

The solution was clear. School lunch. She didn’t eat that either–found it even more distasteful than anything I could prepare–but at least I didn’t have to toil over a steaming stove at 7 in the morning only to find the fruits of my labor untouched. School lunch seemed like a perfect solution to my problem, if not to hers. But the problem with parenting is your kids’ problems, really, are your problems too. Eventually, her pleading wore me down. 

“Please, Mommy, can’t you make me lunch?” she’d beg. “Don’t you want me to eat?”

Finally, I did the only thing I knew worked with picky eaters. Bread and water. 

In my defense, I added a peach. 

Because the peach was never eaten, I just left it in the lunchbox, day after day, whether from optimism or laziness, I’m not sure. Day after day, I persisted in my war of attrition with the peach. Day after day, I watched it grow more bruised and mangled. Finally, I could take it no longer. I euthanized the poor fruit. And I quit packing lunch. 

I am a determined person who tackles problems pro-actively, believing that with enough stamina and flexibility, one can find a solution to any conundrum, no matter how thorny. I am a person who is sometimes wrong. 

As a parent, of course, you have to keep trying. Or at least, someone does. Which is why I decided to pass the baton to my husband. 

“Here,” I said, handing over the Dark Magic Lunchbox. “Good luck.”

“What should I pack?” he asked, innocent that he was. 

I smiled. “Why don’t you ask her?” 

Nicole C. Kear is the author of The Fix-It Friends, a chapter book series for children (Macmillan Kids), as well as the memoir Now I See You (St. Martin’s Press).

Art by Heather Heckel

Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: Department of Education, Dispatches from Babyville, lunch, lunchboxes, Nicole Kear, school

Dispatches From Babyville: SLIME!

August 14, 2018 By Nicole Kear Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: Dispatches from Babyville, Nicole Kear

Re: SLIME

That was the subject heading of the email I received from my son’s middle school about a year and a half ago. I was perplexed. 

I was familiar with the word “slime.” One might use it in all sorts of contexts, especially in relation to snails, or the sludge found in the corners of showers. But I was confounded as to why the middle school would be sending an e-blast about it. 

By Nicole Caccavo Kear, art by Heather Heckel

“Please be advised that the possession or selling of slime is prohibited at school,” the email read, before going on to detail the consequences for slime infractions.

I had so many questions. What kind of slime were we talking about here? And why would a kid want to collect it, take it places and, most inscrutably, sell it?  Also, even if they did, why would the school have a formal position on it? 

I read the email to my husband, and we laughed about it.

“At the end of the day, it’s just slime,” I chuckled. “What could be so terrible about slime?”

There is an Italian proverb my grandmother is fond of using when I’m laughing about something that’s no laughing matter. “Ridi, ridi, che la mamma ha fatto i gnocchi.” It means, “Laugh, laugh, your mom made gnocchi.” Okay, so it’s one of those lost-in translation kinds of things, but the message is: “Go ahead and laugh, you moron! We’ll see who’s laughing soon.” 

It’s an apt proverb to use here as I think of myself a year and a half ago, ignorant about the slippery slope of slime. Laugh, laugh, your kid made slime.

It wasn’t my 7th grade son that succumbed to the slime craze. It was my 4th grade daughter, affectionately known in these pages as Seconda. 

“Mom,” she said after school one day, a few weeks after the enigmatic email. “Can I make slime?”  

Ahhh, I thought, this mysterious slime again. 

“Why?” I asked.

“Because it’s fun,” she answered. Then, sensing that this truthful response wasn’t hugely compelling to a parent, she added: “It’s science! Mixing stuff up.” 

The classic parental Achilles Heel – an educational activity that is just as fun for kids as it is enriching.  Extra points if it relates to math or science.

“Well,” I said. “How do you make it?”

She explained that it was super easy and there were tons of recipes on the internet – all you needed was glue, shaving cream and Borax. 

“You mean, the stuff you clean clothes with?” 

She looked at me like I was a headless kangaroo: “How should I know?” 

The aspect of laundering Seconda’s responsible for is clothing transport – moving the wet clothes to the dryer and the dry clothes to the folding station (AKA my bed). Considering the percentage of clothes that end up on the floor in the process of transport, I don’t think she’ll be promoted to detergent–dispensing any time soon. So, she doesn’t know Borax from Borat.

“I don’t think you should be playing with Borax,” I said. “It seems dangerous.” 

She paused, then said: “Yeah, some kids have been getting chemical burns.”

“WHAT?” I shrieked. It’s unsettling as a neurotic parent when the worst-case-scenario you’ve cooked up ends out being an under-estimation. “If you knew that, why’d you ask me to use it?” 

She shrugged. “I forgot.” Then she added. “But don’t worry, because we can use contact lens solution instead.” 

“That’s good,” I said, trying to imagine ways that contact solution could harm a child. It had the benefit of being engineered expressly to be put in the eye, so that was a definite plus. 

Unable to think of potential bodily harm caused by saline solution, I agreed. That was the beginning of it all.  Slime, like a vampire, has to be invited in. 

Seconda assured me the process would be easy and she could do it all on her own. I didn’t argue. I am sure there are moms out there who enjoy supervising science experiments but I am not one of them. So I accompanied her to get the supplies and then left her to it.

Within about fifteen minutes, there were disquieting noises coming from the kitchen. It wasn’t beakers exploding, but tempers. 

“This is SO dumb!” my daughter yelled. “It DOESN’T WORK!

I walked into the kitchen and gasped. The word “mess” doesn’t come close to describing it. I am reminded of a story I heard, about a Youtube sensation who made a music video using large quantities of chicken hearts. The mess produced was so epic that the cleaning person hired took one look, walked straight out of the house and never came back. It was an unsalvageable mess, one you simply abandon. I think the chicken hearts are still there. This was my reaction upon entering the kitchen after Seconda’s inaugural slime mission.  It hadn’t been a science experiment so much as a battle between her and the glue. The glue won. By a landslide.

“Well, that’s the end of that,” I said after the kitchen was cleaned.

I’ll pause as we both laugh at my naivete.

Because, of course, failing to successfully make the slime only intensified my daughter’s yearning to get it right. A few weeks later, she started begging for another shot, taking a different tack. She reasoned that it was an activity we could do together — mother/ daughter bonding time! Mother/ daughter bonding science time! Did she mention she might want to be a neuroscientist when she grew up? Plus, she’d read that playing with slime was very therapeutic. It helped with stress and anxiety. 

“What helps with the stress and anxiety caused by the slime, though?” I asked. “That’s what I want to know.” 

You don’t need to be Stephen King to put this story together. 

The Slime Kraken had been unleashed. Eventually, I thought, this will get boring. After all, there are so many truly fascinating things that get boring so quickly for children; how could this – the combining of glue, shaving cream and contact lens solution – have unending hypnotic appeal? And yet it does. Maybe it’s because there’s limitless varieties of slime – from the obvious (fluffy slime) to the surprising (snow slime) to the nauseating (butter slime). It seems that you can make slime out of virtually anything – provided it is messy, and hard to get off a carpet. I bought my Kindergartener a pack of Model Magic and was glad to see Seconda partake in the art fun. A few minutes later, I saw her kneading her portion of Model Magic into one of her countless slime vats. 

“What?” she said when I gave her a look. “It makes super spongey slime.”

Her level of fixation is straight-up King Midas. I wouldn’t be surprised if I caught her trying to turn her sister into slime. 

The trouble with slime is, once you get rid of the Borax, it’s hard to point to what’s objectionable about it. Sure, there’s the mess, though this can, with enough rules born of trial-and-error, be contained. Seconda has waged the battle with the glue enough times that she’s able to win it more often than not, and my kitchen doesn’t need to be abandoned like a chicken-heart-strewn-music-video-set. 

Sure, there are slime accidents, and I have, on more than one occasion, stepped right into a sticky, gooey pile of glue gunk on my living room floor. Then I’ll banish slime for a while. and that works, for a few weeks . . . maybe months. Banishing always seems like an easy fix but read Romeo and Juliet or Sleeping Beauty and you’ll see how well it works out. Especially when the thing you’re banishing is mess. Because, when dealing with kids, when is there not a mess? Pretty much only when they’re plugged into screens — which is a whole other ball of wax. 

Maybe the reason the slime craze is so irritating is that I can’t fathom its appeal. 

“Why?” I’ve asked Seconda. “Why do you love slime so much?”

“It’s so satisfying,” is always her reply.

 There couldn’t be a more vague description of its allure. I just don’t get it. 

Which, I guess, means I’m officially the parent of a tween. 

Nicole C. Kear is the author of the chapter book series for children, The Fix-It Friends (Macmillan Kids). You can find more info at fixitfriendsbooks.com

 

Illustration by Heather Heckel

Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: Dispatches from Babyville, Nicole Kear

Running Free

August 16, 2016 By Nicole Kear Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: Babyville, bookworm, childhood, dispatches, fitness, Nicole Kear, tag

When I saw a ball coming towards me as a kid, my first thought was: “run.” Not towards the ball but away from it. If the ball was big enough, I might use it to sit on while reading a book. That was about the extent of my experience with balls. I was the archetypal bookworm, knocking over huge displays of breakfast cereal at the grocery store when I walked right into them while reading. One can certainly be both a bookworm and a sports star, just not if one is me.

Though I didn’t know him at the time, my husband was precisely the same way. He was neither asthmatic nor French, but I do imagine him as a little Proust, scribbling feverishly in a notebook, crying for his mother and lingering over cookies. It’s no surprise then, that our children, aged 11, 9 and 4, are ball-averse story junkies.

In general, I love that my kids share one of my great passions. It allows for easy bonding and there’s always someone to talk to about the latest This American Life podcast. Our shared, sedentary interest is also very convenient on those days when I am thoroughly, ruthlessly exhausted – which is to say, pretty much every day.

When they were young (and still with my preschooler) hypnosis via story-telling was the only way I could distract my kids into doing things they didn’t want to do, such as eating, sleeping, going to the bathroom, walking places, and, occasionally breathing.

The one drawback, though, is that the fine arts of reading, writing, talking and listening do not afford children a ton of physical exercise. And as everyone knows, daily physical exertion is necessary for a healthy lifestyle. Perhaps more importantly, daily physical exertion is necessary for sleep.

This is an important fact when you consider that in addition to being ball-averse, my kids are also sleep-averse. The level of exertion necessary to wear my kids out is extraordinarily high, which is somewhat ironic. It is as though jet fuel courses in their veins instead of blood. Physical romps which cause other children to fall alssep on the subway ride home have no affect whatsoever on my children’s level of alertness. I have no explanation for this. I do, however, have a remedy, namely: Run them ragged.

When you’re trying to think up ways to thoroughly drain the charge out from your kids’ batteries, the first thing you think of is: balls. So, recently, I bought the biggest ball I could find and I dragged my children to a nearby basketball court.

“Play with this ball!” I instructed, like I was a mom from Mars impersonating a human. “Throw it in the basket! It is fun!”

And they did, for two and a half minutes. But they soon tired of the endeavor. Sometimes the ball went in, and sometimes it didn’t and either way it seemed to feel about the same.

So I tried a new game.

“Chase it! Get it!” I instructed, throwing the ball away from my kids. In the dog community, I believe this game is referred to as “Fetch” and it’s a huge hit. It’s less popular well with human children. 

I did not, however, give up. I took the dog game one step further, unleashing our family’s ace in the hole –imagination.

“Let’s pretend the ball is a dog who’s running away from us!” I told my four-year-old, bouncing the ball away from her. “Fido, you naughty little doggie! Come back here!” And, lo and behold, she ran after it, chortling with glee. But ten minutes later, the novelty had worn off.

“Run, run, run!” I exhorted the kids.

“Why?” they asked.

“You’re kids!” I reminded them. “You don’t need a reason to run! It’s supposed to be what you do. A wolf howls. A bird flies. Children run.”

And that’s when my 11-year-old said: “Let’s play tag.”

As a child, I was not a huge fan of tag. I was too busy inventing soap operas for my Barbies to enact, and gossiping with my imaginary friends.

I wasn’t a big fan of tag as a child but I am a big fan now. It involves constant, ceaseless running, which dovetails nicely with my maternal agenda. It is a game that both an 11-year-old and a 4-year-old can enjoy. And it requires no equipment, making it totally free.

But the real reason I love tag is that it’s one of those games you can only truly enjoy in childhood. You reach a certain age, and the appeal just evaporates. I like a good chase scene . . . but only if I’m watching it in a blockbuster while sitting down and shoving popcorn in my mouth. The kids, though, want to be the stars of the chase scene. It’s exciting. It’s invigorating. It’s high stakes.

I sat on a bench at the park and watched the kids play tag. It was a stunning early summer morning – the sun warming but not yet oppressive. There was a delicious breeze that rustled the leaves and almost made me feel as if I lived in the countryside. My kids each bent down on one knee and stuck their feet together.

“Bubble gum bubble gum in a dish, how many pieces do you wish?” my son began – but my littlest one interrupted him. She is wont to pipe up whenever the opportunity presents itself and frequently even when it doesn’t.

“Let me do it! Let ME say the words!” she insisted. And then: ”Daffy Daffy duck eating apple pie. He sat on a rock and he cried because it hurt his butt! You’re it!”

This last bit was directed to my nine-year-old, who accepted the mantle of “It.”

And they were off.

I sit on the bench and watch them run, their matching golden manes glinting in the sun. Their feet – big and little – pounding the pavement hard. Their arms pumping.

“I’m gonna get you!” my daughter, “It,” shrieks, panting
and laughing.

“Ahhhhhh!” shriek the others, looking over the shoulders, a thrilled grin stretching taut the muscles of their mouths.

They laugh as they run. And I laugh too, from a vicarious exhilaration. They’re alive and ignited and just so free.

And also because they’ll sleep come nighttime.

Nicole C. Kear is the author of the memoir Now I See You (St. Martin’s Press, 2014). Her chapter book series for children, The Fix-It Friends, will be published by Macmillan Kids’ Imprint in spring 2017.

Filed Under: Dispatches From Babyville Tagged With: Babyville, bookworm, childhood, dispatches, fitness, Nicole Kear, tag

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2

Primary Sidebar

The Spring 2025 Issue is now available

The Reader Community

READER CONTRIBUTORS

Copyright © 2025 · Park Slope Reader